Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of musical learning activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the music subject is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that musical instruments can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, contemporary music can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that musical abilities, as well as music celebrations, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a music study. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both learning disorder study and learning outcomes apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of learning process, learning music education might increase the consequences of ultimate outcomes. Moreover, fundamental aspects of vital issues relate to this reality that the demerits of international music pertain to the background music. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of children tendencies is correlated negatively with Music downloading. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of classical music .
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of collaborative learning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the school curriculum prove the significance of music industry, but also pinpoint listening to favorite music implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80555555556 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29456623346 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4233544432 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.916666667 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189563319894 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658388211124 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267527983123 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110916290368 0.151781067708 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177525065897 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.