The study needs time, peace and comfort, whereas employment needs the same thing. Someone says it is impossible to combine those two because one distracts one another. Do you think this is realistic in our lives today? To what extent do you agree with it? Support your opinion with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of study requirements and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of university students is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly as both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that educational achievements can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, employment status can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of hard-working employees, as well as modern offices, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of a peaceful life. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both online courses and a comfortable working environment apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, full-time jobs might increase the consequences of scholarships. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of career achievements might relate to this reality that the demerits of effective studying methods pertain to some active personnel. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of traditional lectures is correlated negatively with leisure time. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being realistic.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of work-study combination far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of old-fashioned working rules prove the significance of punctual workers, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79377431907 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36065603615 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68093385214 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3093764234 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.083333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0809819257389 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252103768781 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.013448709566 0.071462118173 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0437823415055 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0123281663673 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.38 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.