There are more and more situations using credit cards instead of cash. It seems that cashless society is becoming a reality. How realistic do you think it is? And do you think it brings benefits or problems?
The importance of using credit cards, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substance influence of using credit cards instead of cash has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the whole society. It can be agreed that using credit cards play a vital role, though it has drawbacks. This essay will elaborate on how credit cards can increase the purchasing process efficiency and how credit cards encourage cybercrime, and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why governments should use credit cards rather than cash, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that credit cards can increase the purchasing process efficiency. As an illustration, research has invariably revealed that customers’ shopping waiting period in Japan have dramatically increased four times compared with use cash after credit cards payment has been introduced to 98 big shopping center in Tokyo. Therefore, governments should use credit cards more frequently rather than cash.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view to believe that credit cards also have some disadvantages as there are innumerable reasons for that but the most salient one is that credit cards encourage cybercrime for the whole society. For instance, the Hong Kong police claim that cybercrime rates in 2018 have dramatically increased by 37% and credit card fraud takes 29% of it. Thus, frequently using credit cards will increase the cybercrime rate for society.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of credit cards in society is prominent, although the cybercrime rate of credit cards should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 451, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'center' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centers'.
Suggestion: centers
... has been introduced to 98 big shopping center in Tokyo. Therefore, governments should...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3663003663 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79300126076 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542124542125 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0803562314 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.181818182 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20759236549 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103683456775 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409757175055 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137351115264 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515202190723 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.