In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of tourism in underdeveloped countries and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that tourism industry is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a boom in tourism can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From an economic standpoint, tourism sector can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that a source of income, as well as creating jobs, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that tourists boost up the economy. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both economic benefits and an increase in gross domestic product apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of sociology, being swarmed with tourists might increase the consequences of a cultural invasion. Moreover, fundamental aspects of attracting tourists relate to this reality that the demerits of the local culture pertain to cultural diversity. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of becoming a tourist magnet is correlated negatively with cultural degradation. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of exchanging cultural values.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of tourism far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a small country becoming a tourist hotspot prove the significance of economic prosperity, but also pinpoint helping local businesses to foster implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60740740741 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21608611149 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7479603148 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116073751298 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409411342773 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424857805368 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0662083402675 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496024165343 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.81 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.