Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people’s life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of buildings' design and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of a placid life are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that responsible people can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, elegant buildings' design can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as a sophisticated design, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of an attractive workplace. Hence, beneficial ramifications of professional persons are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, indifferent buildings can supply the community with negative impacts, which correlate to the reality that demerits of a dismal design are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described frustrated people. Thus, predicted outcomes of inefficient dwellings are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of efficient buildings' design far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of jolly persons prove the significance of an acceptable lifestyle, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76388888889 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30260722857 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680555555556 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5870037988 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.181818182 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204913634555 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586119567947 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581677928418 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106183239368 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608151923594 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.38 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.