Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of architectures and its corresponding impacts on people's daily life has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of design of buildings is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the style of constructions has a significant influence on people private and professional life and I will discuss the pros and cons throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, the importance of architecture might provide a society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of employment, as well as creativity, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered traditional architecture might make people proud. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both being creative and delightful apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the style of buildings can increase the consequences of violence. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of aggressiveness related to this reality that the demerits of poor coloring pertain to weak interior design. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of depression are correlated negatively with coloring in the house. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of designing the buildings.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of modern architecture far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of positive impacts prove the significance of career but also pinpoint day-to-day life implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68029739777 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34524986301 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64312267658 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8671012451 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201879626389 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060081330612 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496237258884 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105486746665 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751266789858 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.