Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning quality is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that observational learning could be a plus, and I will analyze that by providing some academic evidence before the conclusion.
From an academic standpoint, formal education can offer society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that learner's performance and intellectual development are extremely bound up. According to a scientific survey conducted by Sydney National Academy, academic qualification could help youngsters to find a better job opportunity. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both theoretical knowledge and academic references apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, informal learning might improve the consequences of the learning process. Moreover, some opponents of academic learning support their idea through some valid logic based on experimental examples and figures. According to academic research provided by a prestigious institute, collaborative learning and practical courses could be beneficiary for both students and society. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of trying new teaching methods based on experimental studies. Not to mention that group learning based on practical courses have been among some leading universities.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although some authorities tend to believe that formal education should be the only teaching procedure in academic curriculums, I strongly support the idea of experimental learning method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'learners'' or 'learner's'?
Suggestion: learners'; learner's
...ects, which are rooted in the fact that learners performance and intellectual developmen...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93774319066 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23676476228 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618677042802 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9801165859 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163286855354 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621609652204 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326957408066 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10000853763 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204641113777 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.