Which one is better, Textbook library or new digital material in university. The role of a library in keeping books is obsolete. So universities should use digital media. What is your opinion? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages.
Nowadays, it is increasingly acknowledged that digital media are playing a more and more important role in our daily life. While some people believe that Universities should get rid of textbooks, others advocate that the existence of real books is necessary of universities. As far as I am concerned, digital materials are more beneficial in respect of this issue.
People who emphasize the importance of libraries and textbooks are primarily focusing on the health problems caused by digital media. First of all, students will look at the screen continuously while they are reading, but the screen of electronic device is too light. However, this will ruin students’ vision, and then result in poor eyesight. Moreover, digital materials highly rely on internet connection and take notes inconveniently for students.
Nevertheless, this argument cannot hold water. It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that digital media has more advantages. The main justification of this view is that the public internet and free Wi-Fi are quite common in today’s society. That is to say, digital materials can be accessed without the limits of time and locations, which is more helpful for students. In addition, this is cost-effective for students that they do not need to buy plenty of textbooks and digital media are also cheaper than traditional books.
In a nutshell, this controversial topic never fails to attract the public attention, we may safely reach the conclusion that the unavoidable result of digital media taking a place of textbooks are in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, while, in addition, first of all, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31474103586 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01402256042 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605577689243 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6694925485 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.615384615 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.25397266985 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210616484837 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718546959095 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538416211322 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12223222279 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247688483019 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.