Tehnology has infected almost all aspects of our lives. We search for every single question that comes to our minds, including medical problems. But does that really work? I don't think so. That is because not all of the information in websites are scientifically correct or up-to-date. Besides, every diagnose that a doctor makes, is founded on a number of different factors that may affect somebody's well-being and the online research, doesn't cover all of them. Although the net has a response to enumorous questions, for these two reasons, I assumes that it is not enough for health problems.
First, it happens a lot that as users, we find opposite replys to the same query reading a few websites. How can all of them be true? Since we are not expert, we can not deside who tells the right things in net and the only one who can help us to distinguish, is a doctor. In addition, many of the websites, do not get updated based on the putcomes of new studies. So more reliable websites are just those which are confirmed by professional institutes and that means just a few of them.
Second, there are too many items that can cause a trouble and even we as patients are not aware of them. Instead, specialists can figure out what is really going on in our body as they ask us to explain our exact history and symptoms. But internet doesn't do that and just gives us solutions that may not work for our case. For instanse, some people who have had a particular vaccine, may get positive results in TB test, which dosn't mean that they actually are sick. So lack of comprehensive perspective might make internet useless for us in terms of medical issues.
All in all, online research is not the best way for every confusion. It is less risky if ask about medical problem from someone who is there for us as a knowledgable humanbeing with analyzing skills. In this way, it is less likely to be misguided in the situation that is already hard one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... problems. But does that really work? I dont think so. That is because not all of th...
^^^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...k? I dont think so. That is because not all of the information in websites are scientifica...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...dys well-being and the online research, doesnt cover all of them. Although the net has...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 545, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[1]
Message: The pronoun 'I' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'assume'
Suggestion: assume
...ous questions, for these two reasons, I assumes that it is not enough for health proble...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...xact history and symptoms. But internet doesnt do that and just gives us solutions tha...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ss for us in terms of medical issues. All in all, online research is not the b...
^^^
Line 8, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sguided in the situation that is already hard one.
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... situation that is already hard one.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, but, first, if, may, really, second, so, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 350.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58857142857 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55726256703 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574285714286 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.774348554 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.3 100.406767564 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113692140912 0.236089414692 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320011358979 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474120484867 0.0737576698707 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674827915918 0.150856017488 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443909473389 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.05 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.2 Out of 6.0
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.