Technological development leads to a lot of environmental issues. Some people think a simple lifestyle can preserve the environment, while others argue that technology itself can solve it. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
The world is increasingly defined by and dependent on technology and is adopting more cutting-edge technologies at a breathtaking pace, notwithstanding the reality that technology can have both desirable and unpredictable environmental consequences. In an attempt to curb the ecological issues, some propose a simple lifestyle as effective nature protection while others maintain that the negative impact can be reversed by the technology itself. A thorough examination of both arguments should be conducted in order that the optimal solution is produced.
According to the former side, it is an undeniable truth that the world of nature is better preserved with an uncomplicated living standards, which is substantiated by the virtually pristine condition of wildlife habitat before the era of technology. Another aspect is also illustrated in the area of transport in that the exhaust fumes emitted by modern vehicles have damaging effect on the atmosphere, namely air pollution. Furthermore, there are several newly-invented products, though convenient in use, detrimental to the survival of the ecosystem. To be more specific, plastic bags have claimed thousands of marine lives since their very arrival. Given the proof related to transport, natural habitat and technological products, there is sufficient justification for the promotion of simple ways of life.
Their counterparts, however, express a firm belief in the practical applications of technological advances to resolve the environmental problem, namely air quality improvement and solid waste management. As a result of the breakneck progress in the field of technology, ultra-efficient electric cars with networks of battery-charging stations have been introduced as environmentally-friendly mode of transport without gas emissions, therefore reducing the level of air pollution. In addition, other atmosphere purifying devices are also in use in many megacities with promising results. As for solid waste treatment, the technology has revolutionized the established recycling system by a wide range of novel techniques such as anaerobic digestion, biodrying, gasification to name but a few.
Nonetheless, from my standpoint, despite the mixed environmental impact of technology, it is not a feasibility but a reality that technological area is a great contributor to tackling ecological issues. Additionally, the society is so heavily dependent on technology that there seems little likelihood of abandoning highly- sophisticated devices for the sake of nature in this technology-dominated age. Therefore, it would be advisable for humans to exploit the tools of technology to combat the environmental fight. In other words, the management of environmental problems is a long-term battle in which advances in technology field could play a pivotal part if utilized wisely.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'standard'?
Suggestion: standard
... preserved with an uncomplicated living standards, which is substantiated by the virtuall...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, as for, in addition, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2438.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 418.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83253588517 4.8611393121 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.62456850565 2.67179642975 136% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586124401914 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 791.1 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.51630824373 125% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.685280804 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.375 100.406767564 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262081824703 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076072138199 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730293625862 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159226226858 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102022635743 0.0645574589148 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 11.7677419355 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 58.1214874552 34% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.10430107527 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.1575268817 167% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 10.9000537634 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.01818996416 135% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 86.8835125448 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 10.002688172 165% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.247311828 166% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.4 Out of 6.0
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.