Your office is full of plants and no one is watering them on regular basis. To whom this task should be assigned? boss's personal assistant or the whole team. Discuss
Both the choices look reasonable but my preference would be that the task should be allocated to the whole team rather than one single person.
For one thing we should consider ourselves really lucky that we are working in such environment where greenery is giving such preference. As we all know that such environment make workplace more pleasant. Therefore, it is our combine responsibility to water the plants profusely on regular basis to keep the surroundings spick and span and workable. In contrast of assigning the task to boss’s personal assistant will keep him busy all day in watering the plants and therefore might not be able to do office chores.
For another thing, by disbursing the task to each team member will create the sense of loyalty and also provide chance to show their admiration to the company. On the other hand the PA might be qualified personnel therefore by doing such work would realize him as undervalued employee hence inferiority may be the end result.
Being a sincere employee of the company we must take the ownership of work accountability and of course for the sake of humanity we should not let any individual bear the whole burden.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ere greenery is giving such preference. As we all know that such environment make ...
^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...undings spick and span and workable. In contrast of assigning the task to boss's pe...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence inferiority may be the end result. Being a sincere employee of the company ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 186, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t any individual bear the whole burden.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, really, so, therefore, another thing, in contrast, of course, for another thing, for one thing, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 52.1666666667 40% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 1977.66487455 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 200.0 407.700716846 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.945 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.48103885553 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73849867628 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 212.727598566 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 308.7 618.680645161 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.6356860343 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.625 100.406767564 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 18.25 5.45110844103 335% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257243573648 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102734679762 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943157520743 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145253458716 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0764263661083 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 86.8835125448 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.6 Out of 6.0
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.