"According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies ac

Marketing department of Super screen Production company obeserved that fewer people attended Super- Produced movie during the past year when comaprision was done with in any other year.

It might be possible that movies were released in many theatres before the past year.
Were the movies released in the same number of theaters during last year or they were released in a very few theaters? Were the movies released in those area or not where they could be received viewers in large amount? If all above questions answered negative then only increasing a greater share of budget next year to reaching the public through adevrtising weakens the conclusion.

During the past year percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific super screen movies actually increased. It contradicts the statement provided above which stated that fewer pepole attended these movies than in any other year. How might it be possible that positive reviews increased if a very few viewers saw the movies? It weakens the claim.

Director stated that problem lies not with the quality of movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. If pubilc was not aware about the good quality of movie then it was possible that advertising of movies was not done properly and in large extent. Was advertising done in a proper a way or not? It might be possible that in any other year excepting last year, movies attracted the viewers due to only the publicity done for them. Was publicity done at that level for the movies during last year as compared with any other year?

It might be possible that last year company hired a new actor or actress who do not receive that much fame yet. Did company make a movie with new actor and actress? If all above questions are answered in affirmative then company should allocate a greater share of its budget next to reaching the public through advertising.

Votes
Average: 5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'those areas'?
Suggestion: this area; those areas
...w theaters? Were the movies released in those area or not where they could be received vie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ld be received viewers in large amount? If all above questions answered negative t...
^^
Line 10, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o do not receive that much fame yet. Did company make a movie with new actor and ...
^^
Line 10, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ake a movie with new actor and actress? If all above questions are answered in aff...
^^

Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'if', 'then']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260869565217 0.25644967241 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.147826086957 0.15541462614 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.121739130435 0.0836205057962 146% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0463768115942 0.0520304965353 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031884057971 0.0272364105082 117% => OK
Prepositions: 0.171014492754 0.125424944231 136% => OK
Participles: 0.0521739130435 0.0416121511921 125% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.40417546484 2.79052419416 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00869565217391 0.026700313972 33% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.104347826087 0.113004496875 92% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0173913043478 0.0255425247493 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0173913043478 0.0127820249294 136% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1931.0 2731.13054187 71% => OK
No of words: 327.0 446.07635468 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90519877676 6.12365571057 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.57801047555 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345565749235 0.378187486979 91% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.250764525994 0.287650121315 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174311926606 0.208842608468 83% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0825688073394 0.135150697306 61% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40417546484 2.79052419416 86% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 207.018472906 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455657492355 0.469332199767 97% => OK
Word variations: 45.483763724 52.1807786196 87% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.039408867 85% => OK
Sentence length: 19.2352941176 23.2022227129 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5508448149 57.7814097925 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.588235294 141.986410481 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 23.2022227129 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.235294117647 0.724660767414 32% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 44.311746717 51.9672348444 85% => OK
Elegance: 2.14102564103 1.8405768891 116% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433755025541 0.441005458295 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.178348822097 0.135418324435 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.139619937349 0.0829849096947 168% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.604057362074 0.58762219726 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174168407938 0.147661913831 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173175532951 0.193483328276 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140777693566 0.0970749176394 145% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.27682067314 0.42659136922 65% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0723428555321 0.0774707102158 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269658872934 0.312017818177 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137930729125 0.0698173142475 198% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 6.46551724138 124% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.82389162562 177% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 14.657635468 109% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.