The author mentions that since the wildlife sanctuary for the tufted groundhog covers the covers the coastal wetlands of west lansburg and that the west council should not allow the road to be built. The author does not mention the actual scenario of the situation. It does not mention the current population of the tufted groundhog as that would have played a significant role in determining the final decision.
The author also does not mention how building the road might affect the population of the groundhog living in the coastal wetlands. It might be the case that the council is overcautious and does not want to take any risks that would affect the population of the groundhog. It is mentioned that the road is to be built along the edge of the wetlands and perhaps that would not cause trouble for the groundhogs. The author also mentions that the neighboring eastern carpenteria had a similar sanctuary for sea otter and its population has been declining since the repeal of its sanctuary status. It is not mentioned that the current sanctuary is being taken off its status as a sanctuary so comparing the two scenarios is totally irrelevant. These reasoning's are are totally baseless and and a strong statistical evidence is required on the part of the west lansburg council to justify their reason for not granting permission to build road along the wetlands.
Thus the author must come up with more strong evidence and statistics for justifying his argument in this case.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dlife sanctuary for the tufted groundhog covers the covers the coastal wetlands o...
^^
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'covers the'.
Suggestion: covers the
...ife sanctuary for the tufted groundhog covers the covers the coastal wetlands of west lansburg and t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...played a significant role in determining the final decision. The author als...
^^
Line 4, column 758, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: are
...is totally irrelevant. These reasonings are are totally baseless and and a strong stati...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 783, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: and
...ese reasonings are are totally baseless and and a strong statistical evidence is requir...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... to build road along the wetlands. Thus the author must come up with more stron...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'if', 'so', 'thus']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.225190839695 0.25644967241 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.187022900763 0.15541462614 120% => OK
Adjectives: 0.087786259542 0.0836205057962 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0534351145038 0.0520304965353 103% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0343511450382 0.0272364105082 126% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.110687022901 0.125424944231 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0572519083969 0.0416121511921 138% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61170206079 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0190839694656 0.026700313972 71% => OK
Particles: 0.00763358778626 0.001811407834 421% => OK
Determiners: 0.167938931298 0.113004496875 149% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0267175572519 0.0255425247493 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0114503816794 0.0127820249294 90% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1496.0 2731.13054187 55% => OK
No of words: 252.0 446.07635468 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.93650793651 6.12365571057 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.57801047555 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.349206349206 0.378187486979 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.265873015873 0.287650121315 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194444444444 0.208842608468 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134920634921 0.135150697306 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61170206079 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 207.018472906 57% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468253968254 0.469332199767 100% => OK
Word variations: 43.0017690628 52.1807786196 82% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 20.039408867 50% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 25.2 23.2022227129 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9432950542 57.7814097925 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.6 141.986410481 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2 23.2022227129 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.724660767414 55% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.14285714286 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 51.7873015873 51.9672348444 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.43055555556 1.8405768891 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.605074983702 0.441005458295 137% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.272122053718 0.135418324435 201% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.10697948881 0.0829849096947 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.741604345896 0.58762219726 126% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124120602655 0.147661913831 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.358338766969 0.193483328276 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133651072818 0.0970749176394 138% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.468876363982 0.42659136922 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.276304436875 0.0774707102158 357% => No any connections among paragraphs
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.446355659431 0.312017818177 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.195567050725 0.0698173142475 280% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.33743842365 48% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.87684729064 29% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 14.657635468 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.