"On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents involving mopeds and pedestrians, the town council of Balmer Island should limit the number of mopeds rented by the island's moped rental companies from 50 per day to 25 per day during the summer season. By limiting the number of rentals, the town council will attain the 50 percent annual reduction in moped accidents that was achieved last year on the neighboring island of Seaville, when Seaville's town council enforced similar limits on moped rentals."
According to the argument, the high number of accidents with moped and pedestrians convinced the Balmer council to reduce the rental moped to half from its company in order to decrease the accidents. This suggestion shaped through the neighboring island when the number of moped rentals declined to half in summer season then the result of accident attained 50 percent annual reduction.
Compering two different towns’ situation for reporting the same consequence is not persuasive. The number of people who rented moped for transportation are not similar. Maybe, in Seavilla people are less enthusiastic to use moped rather than Balmer citizens so the number of accidents were published in two different towns are indeterminate. Other reason might be related to users. There is no guarantee that all people know how to use the vehicle in appropriate way or maybe some mopeds were served to people have mechanical problems as a reason it caused accidents. The other reason which should be considered is the shaped and style of streets .It is important that the streets well designed based on standards for moped users to guide them whenever is essential to stop or reduce their speeds according the signs. The law for high speed drivers when pedestrian are walking should be measured and deliberate to users which it can be considered in Seaville’s town for reducing accidents.
In conclusion, the argument are not satisfy reader in advantage of limiting the numbers of moped rentals in order to reduce the accident result because of lots of ambiguities and week points. Author needs to use clear examples and use reasonable statistics to persuade readers why limiting moped rentals in Seaville has perceptible impact on reducing percentage of accidents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t attained 50 percent annual reduction. Compering two different towns' situ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 652, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...dered is the shaped and style of streets .It is important that the streets well de...
^^
Line 2, column 654, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...red is the shaped and style of streets .It is important that the streets well desi...
^^
Line 2, column 1001, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lle's town for reducing accidents. In conclusion, the argument are not sati...
^^^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'satisfied'.
Suggestion: satisfied
... In conclusion, the argument are not satisfy reader in advantage of limiting the num...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct on reducing percentage of accidents.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 28.8173652695 31% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 55.5748502994 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 2260.96107784 66% => OK
No of words: 284.0 441.139720559 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22887323944 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83882970193 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566901408451 0.468620217663 121% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 705.55239521 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2054833288 57.8364921388 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 119.503703932 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 23.324526521 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.70786347227 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262541980356 0.218282227539 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986877864603 0.0743258471296 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581608091351 0.0701772020484 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180887387631 0.128457276422 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465217783087 0.0628817314937 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.3799401198 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.5979740519 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32208582834 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 98.500998004 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.