Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many servers have reported that a number of customers who still ask for butter do not complain when they are given margarine instead. Clearly, either these customers cannot distinguish margarine from butter, or they use the term 'butter' to refer to either butter or margarine. Thus, to avoid the expense of purchasing butter, the Happy Pancake House should extend this cost-saving change to its restaurants in the southeast and northeast as well.
This argument is based on the replacement of butter by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants through out southwestern United States. According to the author, this replacement by the restaurant is welcomed by the customers. He has supported his argument by providing the figures which states that only 2 percent customers are complaining, rest are fine with it. But author has also clearly stated that the customers might not be able to differentiate between butter and margarine, so, the above figures provided by him holds no ground. They are irrelevant and are acquired by not providing complete information to the customers. The author is suggesting to imitate this cost saving change to its restaurants in southwest and northwest.
Planning the diet by ensuring the correct composition of ingredients is the golden rule for any restaurant. If any changes are made to the composition without seeking opinions from customers might lead to bad results. When customers were served with margarine, upsetting their regular composition of their diet, without asking them might have led them to turn to some other restaurant where there opinions are respected.
Margarine, being a less known ingredient might have some positive as well as negative impacts on health. It might taste similar to butter but its impact on health might not. It might be possible that customers are consuming margarine without even thinking about it because of their faith in the restaurant. It might be assumed by the customers that whatever served by the restaurant is of good quality and have no adverse effect on their health. Customers might be in wrong impression that margarine is better than butter because it has less fat and cholesterol. This can also be the reason for less complaints against margarine.
Before changing any ingredient, restaurant owner should inform his customers. Let customers decide what is wrong and what is right for them, after all they are paying for their meal. Owner should hold a voting session in his other restaurants in southeast and northeast and should take the decision accordingly. He should not take any decision blindly without informing his customers. He can extend his cost saving change to other restaurants only and only if he is allowed to do so by his customers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...rine in Happy Pancake House restaurants through out southwestern United States. According t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... is the golden rule for any restaurant. If any changes are made to the composition...
^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cause of their faith in the restaurant. It might be assumed by the customers that ...
^^
Line 5, column 596, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun complaints is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...sterol. This can also be the reason for less complaints against margarine. Before...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['accordingly', 'also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'after all', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220843672457 0.25644967241 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.18858560794 0.15541462614 121% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0719602977667 0.0836205057962 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0446650124069 0.0520304965353 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0719602977667 0.0272364105082 264% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.131513647643 0.125424944231 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0769230769231 0.0416121511921 185% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.79194578232 2.79052419416 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.029776674938 0.026700313972 112% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0818858560794 0.113004496875 72% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0372208436725 0.0255425247493 146% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0173697270471 0.0127820249294 136% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2302.0 2731.13054187 84% => OK
No of words: 374.0 446.07635468 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1550802139 6.12365571057 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.57801047555 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382352941176 0.378187486979 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.29679144385 0.287650121315 103% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.211229946524 0.208842608468 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.160427807487 0.135150697306 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79194578232 2.79052419416 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 207.018472906 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.469332199767 107% => OK
Word variations: 53.541502548 52.1807786196 103% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.039408867 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7 23.2022227129 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5247669641 57.7814097925 58% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.1 141.986410481 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 23.2022227129 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.4 0.724660767414 55% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 48.379144385 51.9672348444 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.40650406504 1.8405768891 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324091672501 0.441005458295 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.149763841968 0.135418324435 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0825967799082 0.0829849096947 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.513614564692 0.58762219726 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0923885447592 0.147661913831 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120259308578 0.193483328276 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088480405923 0.0970749176394 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.245834545805 0.42659136922 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0752428803755 0.0774707102158 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205725197149 0.312017818177 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101693310416 0.0698173142475 146% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.33743842365 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.82512315271 145% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 14.657635468 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.