Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership
Revitalization is the basis of our lives, be it goods or the accessories we use, Revitalization has always been the basis. In a similar way when it comes to the major fields like education, government, politics, business, revitalization is needed. It makes sure things are getting developed with fresh and new ideas coming up. To have the same person for a long period might lead to monotony, which may later create problems, cause not all work is done well by a person, everybody lag in certain areas which may be left under developed or foreseen. In order to make better approach or to have new ideas and policies coming up for betterment revitalization is needed.
Adding up to the assertion, it is always better to have a fresh policy for every 5years term. Which makes the person think that, he has to work and prove with in a span of 5years, for his work is evaluated for only these years. This makes sure he doesn’t take his work for granted. Now a days the leaders are majorly choose by the people in the country and the generations keep changing and the youngsters come up with fresh minds and are given an opportunity to select their leader, which makes the leader choose to be according to the time n date, if not the youngsters might not be happy with the judgment made long-long ago.
Moreover, 5years is not a short term it is adequate for a leader to show his work to the people. Even if he fails to conduct his job, people are given a chance to recorrect their decisions unlike the other case. The long term authority leads to dictator ship.
For example, we have seen Hitler miss using his power to dictatorship which hence led to many distractions. Musharaf of Pakistan has also seen doing the same. Power for a longer term might lead to many hazardous consequences as the person takes the power for granted. Though, the previous leader is experienced it needs a new person to come up in order to maintain the balance. A person who is given a new chance has the zeal to do the work unlike a person who has been doing it since many days.
It all sums up to having a change in the leaders for a betterment and not having a same leader for a longer period which may lead to a standardized and irreversible state of the fields and nothing new can be seen after a period of time
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...vitalization has always been the basis. In a similar way when it comes to the major fields like ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
...doesn't take his work for granted. Now a days the leaders are majorly choose by the p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...n't take his work for granted. Now a days the leaders are majorly choose by the p...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...ted. Now a days the leaders are majorly choose by the people in the country and the ge...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the person takes the power for granted. Though, the previous leader is experienced it ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 222, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...lds and nothing new can be seen after a period of time
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'as to', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.217391304348 0.25644967241 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.2 0.15541462614 129% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0760869565217 0.0836205057962 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0391304347826 0.0520304965353 75% => OK
Pronouns: 0.045652173913 0.0272364105082 168% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0891304347826 0.125424944231 71% => OK
Participles: 0.0630434782609 0.0416121511921 152% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.56971559835 2.79052419416 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0521739130435 0.026700313972 195% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0108695652174 0.001811407834 600% => OK
Determiners: 0.117391304348 0.113004496875 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0152173913043 0.0255425247493 60% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0195652173913 0.0127820249294 153% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2304.0 2731.13054187 84% => OK
No of words: 421.0 446.07635468 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47268408551 6.12365571057 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.57801047555 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.266033254157 0.378187486979 70% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.159144893112 0.287650121315 55% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.121140142518 0.208842608468 58% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0878859857482 0.135150697306 65% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56971559835 2.79052419416 92% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 207.018472906 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46080760095 0.469332199767 98% => OK
Word variations: 50.0883643022 52.1807786196 96% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.039408867 90% => OK
Sentence length: 23.3888888889 23.2022227129 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.5015539847 57.7814097925 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 141.986410481 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3888888889 23.2022227129 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.724660767414 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 3.58251231527 167% => OK
Readability: 39.3033782001 51.9672348444 76% => OK
Elegance: 1.29770992366 1.8405768891 71% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248109950502 0.441005458295 56% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112640762016 0.135418324435 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0759749819566 0.0829849096947 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.550182664616 0.58762219726 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174399683459 0.147661913831 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108595210935 0.193483328276 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574821872496 0.0970749176394 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.398884590745 0.42659136922 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0735977268503 0.0774707102158 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167813810118 0.312017818177 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405897292593 0.0698173142475 58% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.33743842365 132% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 6.46551724138 139% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 14.657635468 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.