The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Batavia newspaper.
"The department of agriculture in Batavia reports that the number of dairy farms throughout the country is now 25 percent greater than it was 10 years ago. During this same time period, however, the price of milk at the local Excello Food Market has increased from $1.50 to over $3.00 per gallon. To prevent farmers from continuing to receive excessive profits on an apparently increased supply of milk, the Batavia government should begin to regulate retail milk prices. Such regulation is necessary to ensure both lower prices and an adequate supply of milk for consumers."
The author of the letter claims that the price of milk have been increased despite of increase in the number of diary farms. So he intended to regulate the price raise by considering the following reason, Eventhough there is a increase in number of farms by 25% during the period of ten years, the price of milk at the local Excello Food Market increased from $1.50 to over $3.00 per gallon. But the above aforementioned assumption may or may not hold true, when considering the following assumptions. Reports suggest only about the increase in diary farms, it doesn't indicate any details about the number of diary animals used. It is pointing out only to a specific market called Excello Food Market. And the maintenance cost and other factors are not considered for the prices rise.
First, Reports by the agriculture department in Batavia says that there is 25% rise in the diary farms than it was 10 years ago. This is too broad to jump into any conclusion, because it doesnot provide any information about the number of diary animals and the type of animals used for milk porduction. Consider a possibility, What if, same number of animals used as 10 years back, but the maintaining space is increased for each animals due to technological improvement during the period of ten years. So it may need more diary farms.
Further, The prise raise may be only in certain specified market. Whereas the other markets in the Batavia may have a lower retail price for milk. Ten years ago, The diary animals may not maintained well, whereas now, due to technological development in agricultural sectors, the price of maintaining their shelter, cost of healthy foods for the diary animals may increase the retail value. Thus these factoes will results in the rise of the cost of the milk products.
This litany of unsupported assumptions seriously jeopardizes the certainty of the conclusion. Thus the above letter may be factually wrong. And if these assumptions are correct, then the Batavia government maynot take any actions regarding the price rise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e following reason, Eventhough there is a increase in number of farms by 25% duri...
^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... may need more diary farms. Further, The prise raise may be only in certain specified ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... animals may increase the retail value. Thus these factoes will results in the rise ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...e retail value. Thus these factoes will results in the rise of the cost of the milk pro...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rdizes the certainty of the conclusion. Thus the above letter may be factually wrong...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'whereas']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.277922077922 0.25644967241 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.119480519481 0.15541462614 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0961038961039 0.0836205057962 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.038961038961 0.0520304965353 75% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0181818181818 0.0272364105082 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145454545455 0.125424944231 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0311688311688 0.0416121511921 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7018159725 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0155844155844 0.026700313972 58% => OK
Particles: 0.0025974025974 0.001811407834 143% => OK
Determiners: 0.127272727273 0.113004496875 113% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0233766233766 0.0255425247493 92% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00519480519481 0.0127820249294 41% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2056.0 2731.13054187 75% => OK
No of words: 346.0 446.07635468 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94219653179 6.12365571057 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.57801047555 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335260115607 0.378187486979 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251445086705 0.287650121315 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.156069364162 0.208842608468 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.115606936416 0.135150697306 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7018159725 2.79052419416 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 207.018472906 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494219653179 0.469332199767 105% => OK
Word variations: 51.3667123755 52.1807786196 98% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.039408867 85% => OK
Sentence length: 20.3529411765 23.2022227129 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.721930519 57.7814097925 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.941176471 141.986410481 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 23.2022227129 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.724660767414 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 45.497449847 51.9672348444 88% => OK
Elegance: 2.57352941176 1.8405768891 140% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.617367636137 0.441005458295 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124820932858 0.135418324435 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.108552001897 0.0829849096947 131% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.559591354837 0.58762219726 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.172098366209 0.147661913831 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.264830550374 0.193483328276 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134833034387 0.0970749176394 139% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.481699279384 0.42659136922 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0594689510202 0.0774707102158 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.457239295722 0.312017818177 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658924332447 0.0698173142475 94% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.33743842365 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 6.46551724138 108% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 14.657635468 89% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.