The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper in Masontown:
“If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees, we need to encourage our residents to recycle more. Late last year, our neighbouring town, Hayesworth, passed a law requiring that all households recycle paper and glass, or pay a fine. Since that time, Hayesworth has seen its garbage disposal costs significantly decrease. If we implemented an advertising campaign encouraging our residents to recycle, Masontown would also save money on disposal of its waste.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
In the passage editor of local newspaper states that to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees and have to encourage people to recycle more. To support the statement editor gave the example of the neighboring town in which they passed a law required that all households recycle paper and glass ,or pay a nice amount as fine. Since that the town seems to a having decrements in its garbage disposal costs significantly. So the editor also wan to implement same strategy on his hometown to decrease the cost of garbage disposal. In this assertion i state my stand as in total disagreement of it due to lack of information and guidance.
Firstly, To reason with editor's claim on what basis of information the editor is claiming that the cost has gone down in a huge manner? there is just a basic information given that due to making a law the cost has decreased. The argument doesn't provide any information about the in how much amount the cost has decreased to. The claim also states that the by comparing the neighbor town they want to pass a new law. But do they know how much people are following that low? How the system works their? What facilities are provided to the houses? They all remains unanswered.
Secondly, let's agree to the claim that the cost decrease for the moment. However this derived information comes from the survey done last year. There might be possibility that the number of people wasn't sufficient to create a general assumption. Here editor's whole claim is based on this survey made what if this survey was done in a single part of town with lesser population compare to the other parts? What if the survey was done only in a part which follows this low? The whole thing makes it bemusing.
Third, Here it's good that a person is trying to encourage the people to recycle and reduction in costs at the some time. Which is praise worthy but on the basis the thing is applied seems shaky to me. To support the passage editor doesn't seem to be answering the queries i got. The survey , cost of before and after implying, on how many people they are going to apply this law and a lot more queries. If the information is provided enough i could've agreed to the terms and conditions i have to follow to reduce cost and save environment at the same time.
In sum, due to lesser information and guidance i clear my stand as disagreement towards to editor's letter and I adhere to it till the end. The proposal is good but information is not given enough to make a law out of it. Also the reason mentioned above explains the flaws in the editor’s letter. Even though the idea is good but the approach doesn’t seem music to my ears.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 301, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t all households recycle paper and glass ,or pay a nice amount as fine. Since that...
^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd glass ,or pay a nice amount as fine. Since that the town seems to a having decreme...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a huge manner" with adverb for "huge"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...is claiming that the cost has gone down in a huge manner? there is just a basic information give...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...he cost has gone down in a huge manner? there is just a basic information given that ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 240, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...aw the cost has decreased. The argument doesnt provide any information about the in ho...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 439, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...to pass a new law. But do they know how much people are following that low? How the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'remain'
Suggestion: remain
...es are provided to the houses? They all remains unanswered. Secondly, lets agree to...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... that the cost decrease for the moment. However this derived information comes from the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 198, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...e possibility that the number of people wasnt sufficient to create a general assumpti...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...o recycle and reduction in costs at the some time. Which is praise worthy but on the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ky to me. To support the passage editor doesnt seem to be answering the queries i got....
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...doesnt seem to be answering the queries i got. The survey , cost of before and af...
^
Line 7, column 290, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... answering the queries i got. The survey , cost of before and after implying, on h...
^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... due to lesser information and guidance i clear my stand as disagreement towards ...
^
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... given enough to make a law out of it. Also the reason mentioned above explains the...
^^^^
Line 9, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... explains the flaws in the editor's letter. Even though the idea is good bu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.9520958084 8% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 28.8173652695 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 55.5748502994 128% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 2260.96107784 97% => OK
No of words: 481.0 441.139720559 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56756756757 5.12650576532 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49243358353 2.78398813304 90% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 204.123752495 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.471933471933 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 705.55239521 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Interrogative: 3.0 0.471057884232 637% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 19.7664670659 142% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3236829508 57.8364921388 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.4642857143 119.503703932 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1785714286 23.324526521 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.39285714286 5.70786347227 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 5.25449101796 305% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.67664670659 235% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151609611511 0.218282227539 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395455490146 0.0743258471296 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598942332371 0.0701772020484 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0878625054256 0.128457276422 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627890873465 0.0628817314937 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 14.3799401198 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.3550499002 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.197005988 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 12.5979740519 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.32208582834 87% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 98.500998004 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.