The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:
A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
The letter to President of Seatown University is infelicitous in many ways as it contains irrational contents for the future of University.
The letter says that there is a study conducted in Oceania University which is nearby from Seatown University. Oceania is a different University consisting a variety of people, Different rules to follow according to their area. The rules of Oceania cannot be compared with the rules of Seatown. It is not mentioned whether Oceania or Seatown is better in professors, ranking or for the fact anything.
In both the Universities, different procedures are followed. The universities are not comparable.
Secondly, imbibing free tuition fee won't inherit morale or improve our values. No mention of the fact that instituting free tuition free will have better professor in knowledge or qualification. There is no surety of new professors to be better than previous ones. Notwithstanding, competition will either increase or decrease. No promising future will be there for the students in the university.
The letter stands no validation for better future nor promising career of students in University by instituting free tuition fee for professors. The university should work towards the welfare of the students, betterment of their career.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 28.8173652695 24% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 55.5748502994 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 2260.96107784 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 199.0 441.139720559 45% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47236180905 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 4.56307096286 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1318105252 2.78398813304 112% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 204.123752495 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527638190955 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 705.55239521 49% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9907820396 57.8364921388 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.7857142857 119.503703932 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2142857143 23.324526521 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.70786347227 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294544605594 0.218282227539 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103901294645 0.0743258471296 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0936215695734 0.0701772020484 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157986925532 0.128457276422 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685392442142 0.0628817314937 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 48.3550499002 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 12.5979740519 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 98.500998004 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.