The following appeared in a newletter offering advice to investors:
Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term. We urge all our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed satellite technology has been approve by the FTA to compete with the current satellite provider. That company is Techcorporation. A consumer survey last year indicated that over eighty percent of respondents were dissatisfied with the current satellite provider and would want to switch to another provider if the industry were not a monopoly. Thus, the new venture of Techcorporation into satellite television will prove to be highly profitable for those who invest now.
The advice from the newsletter to the investor is to invest in the Techcorporation which is their top pick for the investment this term. The company Techcorporation is the first company to develop satellite technology and has been approved by FTA to compete with the current satellite providers as eighty percent of respondents were not satisfied with the current satellite television provider and so wanted to switch to another provider. And due to this the new venture of Techcorporation would be highly profitable for those who invest in it now.
This advice from the newsletter to investors is true but it doesn't mean that it should be there top pick for this term for investment as it is not shown that the other companies would ensure huge loss. It is also be noted that since it is the first company which has been approved by FTA as a satellite telvision provider would be successful enough in its first year and on what basis have the FTA approved it for providing service or it is only the company which has been able to fulfill the demands of FTA and other companies have not in the recent year. As the newsletter also tells that about eighty percent of the survey respondents were dissatisfied with the television provider last year doesnt mean that all the eighty percent of people would take the services of the new television provider. Moreover, it might have happened that the respondents were quite a small group of people who filled the survey and are not happy and since the number of people who are unsatisfied and would take the services of upcoming company and to if the industry is not a monopoly. People can be expected to take services of the new service providers if it offered good discount and service to them and publicises well about its company or it might be possible that the people are unaware about the company and it may end up with huge loss and that would also mean that the investors a wholesome amount of money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... newsletter to investors is true but it doesnt mean that it should be there top pick f...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... companies have not in the recent year. As the newsletter also tells that about ei...
^^
Line 2, column 695, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... with the television provider last year doesnt mean that all the eighty percent of peo...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'well']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.228813559322 0.25644967241 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.166666666667 0.15541462614 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0932203389831 0.0836205057962 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.045197740113 0.0520304965353 87% => OK
Pronouns: 0.045197740113 0.0272364105082 166% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.135593220339 0.125424944231 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0338983050847 0.0416121511921 81% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.60876650467 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0338983050847 0.026700313972 127% => OK
Particles: 0.00282485875706 0.001811407834 156% => OK
Determiners: 0.121468926554 0.113004496875 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0310734463277 0.0255425247493 122% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0197740112994 0.0127820249294 155% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1951.0 2731.13054187 71% => OK
No of words: 345.0 446.07635468 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65507246377 6.12365571057 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.57801047555 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.301449275362 0.378187486979 80% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.223188405797 0.287650121315 78% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.15652173913 0.208842608468 75% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110144927536 0.135150697306 81% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60876650467 2.79052419416 93% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 207.018472906 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.397101449275 0.469332199767 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 39.8234493819 52.1807786196 76% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 20.039408867 40% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 43.125 23.2022227129 186% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 82.9901161284 57.7814097925 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 243.875 141.986410481 172% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.125 23.2022227129 186% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.724660767414 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 5.14285714286 39% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 65.4438405797 51.9672348444 126% => OK
Elegance: 1.54945054945 1.8405768891 84% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359856388294 0.441005458295 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.26088440377 0.135418324435 193% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0862231737013 0.0829849096947 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.68100048674 0.58762219726 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0933250243194 0.147661913831 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.234236514889 0.193483328276 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968110270944 0.0970749176394 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.612185476798 0.42659136922 144% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0 0.0774707102158 0% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.364161205607 0.312017818177 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819659359207 0.0698173142475 117% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.33743842365 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.87684729064 29% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.82512315271 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 6.46551724138 77% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 5.36822660099 37% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 7.0 14.657635468 48% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.