With the information provided, the assumptions leading to conclusion remains unfounded. Woven baskets is considerably famous in the Palean, whereas, archaeologist explored it in Lithos, in addition river is highly deep and broad. There is not any board there. Therefore we can express basket were not only Palean. Because of lack of evidences, the assumptions made were erroneous and hence the conclusion is ill-founded.
The primary assumption underlying author's conclusion is that relevant to river. As we all know that everything change in during time such as geological phenomena and whether occurrence. Due to the fact that rive become smaller or shallow. For instance some events such as drought make a slight volume of water. Nonetheless, he fails to preclude the possibility that river has changed .Want of such prudent answers makes the author assumptions full of holes. So, to reinforce the argument author should have discussed about that may be river become has sever shift along time.
Moreover, the author further assumes that this basket is pertaining to the Lithos people. However, the author fails to take other possible reasons into account a variety of people travel to this area due to various reasons such as marriage or hostage. So, to reinforce the argument author should have provided information about migration of people and created it.
Furthermore, the author of the argument avers that lack of boat in region. As a matter of fact researchers did not find any tools such as boat which is vital for cross river. Without considering and ruling out this and other possible reasons the boat becomes erode via water and time. Author cannot substantially conclude that shortage of boat is a great reason for this event. By considering this fact that we all know that there is boat in other culture or surrounding area or a plethora of merchants deliver a great deal of baskets to this location. So, to reinforce the argument author should have discussed about boat that built and erode during time and a considerable amount of goods that transfer via merchant.
On the whole, the author makes unsustainable assumptions based on vague evidences. On the other hand if the author had given evidences like a legal survey or shown some statistics that validated his assumptions then the argument would have been more cogent. He should have discussed about detail of river and shifting it during time, besides, migration of people is an indispensable point that we should consider without any doubt.
With the information provided, the assumptions leading to conclusion remains unfounded. Woven baskets is considerably famous in the Palean, whereas, archaeologist explored it in Lithos, in addition river is highly deep and broad. There is not any board there. Therefore we can express basket were not only Palean. Because of lack of evidences, the assumptions made were erroneous and hence the conclusion is ill-founded.
The primary assumption underlying author's conclusion is that relevant to river. As we all know that everything change in during time such as geological phenomena and whether occurrence. Due to the fact that rive become smaller or shallow. For instance some events such as drought make a slight volume of water. Nonetheless, he fails to preclude the possibility that river has changed .Want of such prudent answers makes the author assumptions full of holes. So, to reinforce the argument author should have discussed about that may be river become has sever shift along time.
Moreover, the author further assumes that this basket is pertaining to the Lithos people. However, the author fails to take other possible reasons into account a variety of people travel to this area due to various reasons such as marriage or hostage. So, to reinforce the argument author should have provided information about migration of people and created it.
Furthermore, the author of the argument avers that lack of boat in region. As a matter of fact researchers did not find any tools such as boat which is vital for cross river. Without considering and ruling out this and other possible reasons the boat becomes erode via water and time. Author cannot substantially conclude that shortage of boat is a great reason for this event. By considering this fact that we all know that there is boat in other culture or surrounding area or a plethora of merchants deliver a great deal of baskets to this location. So, to reinforce the argument author should have discussed about boat that built and erode during time and a considerable amount of goods that transfer via merchant.
On the whole, the author makes unsustainable assumptions based on vague evidences. On the other hand if the author had given evidences like a legal survey or shown some statistics that validated his assumptions then the argument would have been more cogent. He should have discussed about detail of river and shifting it during time, besides, migration of people is an indispensable point that we should consider without any doubt.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...nd broad. There is not any board there. Therefore we can express basket were not only Pal...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e the possibility that river has changed .Want of such prudent answers makes the a...
^^
Line 2, column 391, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Want
...the possibility that river has changed .Want of such prudent answers makes the autho...
^^^^
Line 2, column 570, Rule ID: ALONG_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'a long time'?
Suggestion: a long time
...hat may be river become has sever shift along time. Moreover, the author further assumes ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'such as', 'as a matter of fact', 'on the whole', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.263736263736 0.25644967241 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.156043956044 0.15541462614 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0901098901099 0.0836205057962 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0461538461538 0.0520304965353 89% => OK
Pronouns: 0.021978021978 0.0272364105082 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134065934066 0.125424944231 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0417582417582 0.0416121511921 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7372227783 2.79052419416 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0263736263736 0.026700313972 99% => OK
Particles: 0.0021978021978 0.001811407834 121% => OK
Determiners: 0.105494505495 0.113004496875 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0197802197802 0.0255425247493 77% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00879120879121 0.0127820249294 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2525.0 2731.13054187 92% => OK
No of words: 412.0 446.07635468 92% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1286407767 6.12365571057 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.57801047555 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.388349514563 0.378187486979 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269417475728 0.287650121315 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.18932038835 0.208842608468 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.128640776699 0.135150697306 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7372227783 2.79052419416 98% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 207.018472906 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509708737864 0.469332199767 109% => OK
Word variations: 56.7514288704 52.1807786196 109% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.039408867 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.9130434783 23.2022227129 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2624959591 57.7814097925 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.782608696 141.986410481 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9130434783 23.2022227129 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.782608695652 0.724660767414 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.58251231527 112% => OK
Readability: 44.8547910511 51.9672348444 86% => OK
Elegance: 1.96078431373 1.8405768891 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429157129511 0.441005458295 97% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0978418776337 0.135418324435 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0693449716518 0.0829849096947 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.494513775753 0.58762219726 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.123542827384 0.147661913831 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162115371833 0.193483328276 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151907957835 0.0970749176394 156% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.326744842025 0.42659136922 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0653537442281 0.0774707102158 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312716205806 0.312017818177 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.237123475417 0.0698173142475 340% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.33743842365 60% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.82512315271 207% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 6.46551724138 46% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 5.36822660099 149% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.82389162562 212% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the performance of average users. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.