The argument states that many lives will be saved if inoculations against cow flu are routinely registered, but since there a small possibility than people will die from inoculations, it should not be taken. However, there are many assumptions which need to carefully considered before evaluating the argument.
Firstly, are there alternative inoculations available? if there are alternative available their effects can be studied determine if these are safer. All the different inoculations should be considered for their potency and side-effects to find the best one.
Additionally, the argument has not specified the exact possibility of a person dying from cow flu. If it is as small as one person in a billion, then it is even less harmful than dying from an ant-bite; this makes administering this inoculation completely safe. However, if it turns out to be more fatal, like one in a hundred people, then this supports the argument that these inoculations should not be administered.
Finally, the argument has not specified what groups of people are in danger of dying from these inoculations. For instance, old people might be susceptible or children might be susceptible. By studying the groups of people who have a greater risk of dying from these inoculations can give us greater insight to evaluate the arguments.
In conclusion, the argument leaves many blanks which need to be filled. By considering alternatives, the exact risk of the inoculation and the people who are at risk of the inoculation can we better understand and evaluate the argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...ere alternative inoculations available? if there are alternative available their e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 55.5748502994 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 16.3942115768 67% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 2260.96107784 59% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 252.0 441.139720559 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25396825397 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09688600821 2.78398813304 111% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 204.123752495 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511904761905 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 705.55239521 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3973874377 57.8364921388 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.846153846 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 5.70786347227 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316576428808 0.218282227539 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115468737326 0.0743258471296 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105087564525 0.0701772020484 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181357609656 0.128457276422 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111923586807 0.0628817314937 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.5979740519 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.32208582834 95% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.