Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain
Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain
The Statement is strongly indicating to stop all the human activities that is causing harm to the natural areas which are yet in their natural state. The statement without any doubt holds valid value so human interventions have disturbed the balance of nature so much that if this all is not stopped right here, one day the blue planed will become a no man’s land however there are certain aspects which author seems to be missed.
Firstly, there is only mention of economic gain without considering the fact that some of human activity have no effect negative effect on nature for example – if there is a university planned there, it will have no carbon footprints hence having 0 impact on nature, while on other side pollution released by a oil refinery will definitely have adverse effect on climate.
Additionally, stopping all the development sounds appealing and effective while in actual it will not be viable taking into consideration the effects It will have on economy and jobs related to it. The better idea will be to have sustainable development in a way that it makes the industry keeping in mind the nature at first place, rather than just stopping the development afforestation along with development can be the common ground for the good of all.
Finally, Examining all the aspects of the issue , the issue talks about a matter of real concern and that holds high value if it focuses only on the the industry the possess harm to nature along with keeping in mind a sustainable development rather then a complete full stop.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 310, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ile on other side pollution released by a oil refinery will definitely have adver...
^
Line 6, column 48, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
..., Examining all the aspects of the issue , the issue talks about a matter of real ...
^^
Line 6, column 146, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... holds high value if it focuses only on the the industry the possess harm to nature alo...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 146, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... holds high value if it focuses only on the the industry the possess harm to nature alo...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 163, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... if it focuses only on the the industry the possess harm to nature along with keeping in mi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 250, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...n mind a sustainable development rather then a complete full stop.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, then, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 55.5748502994 61% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 2260.96107784 63% => OK
No of words: 289.0 441.139720559 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90311418685 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60462636054 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56401384083 0.468620217663 120% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 705.55239521 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.22255489022 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 19.7664670659 30% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 48.0 22.8473053892 210% => Sentence length is too long
Sentence length SD: 52.3662316977 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 236.166666667 119.503703932 198% => OK
Words per sentence: 48.1666666667 23.324526521 207% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 12.1666666667 5.70786347227 213% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339039730363 0.218282227539 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180234281372 0.0743258471296 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.26021083365 0.0701772020484 371% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268000594123 0.128457276422 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.367666689476 0.0628817314937 585% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.7 14.3799401198 179% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.76 48.3550499002 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 22.0 12.197005988 180% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.03 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32208582834 115% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 98.500998004 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 12.3882235529 226% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 21.2 11.1389221557 190% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.