The argument talks about the corelation between the increment in the popularity of skateboarding and decrement of shoppers. They explains it because of amount of litter and property destruction has been increased in years due to skateboarding. In the end they also recommend to prohibit the skateboarding to increase the business of central plaza.
Here the passage is based upon the assumption that popularity of skateboarding has been the reason for more littering. But more littering might had been caused due to many other reasons which are not being considered in the argument. To examplify if number of food shops has also been increased in the same time and people are not throwing the garbage into respective bins. Since there has been no other information on this reason a conclusion could not be drawn so easily.
It could be deduced from the passage that central plaza had been running from many years and suddenly they started sakteboarding into the plaza. At the same time shoppers had been decreasing with some other reason as shopkeepers are not up to date with the market standerds, market products etc. and the decrement in the shoppers while introducing the skateboarding had might been the coincidence only. Author is never talking about these details into the argument so before taking any decision survey should be done for these as well.
Since there are only store owners who believe that skateboarding is the main reason for decrement of shoppers but there is not reliable source for this information. They just had observed this thing and which could be wrong in many situation. Such as people had stopped coming to few stores only and they are blaming skateboarding for that. We also dont know how much store owners do belive in this reason? If there had been only a few who are getting agreed with this then skateboarding is not the problem in any scenario. so any decision should be based upon reliable sources or atleast with variety of shopkeepers who are facing this problem.
The reccomendation that has been suggested is presuming that by prohibiting the skateboarding the littering and vandalism would be decreased throughout the time and people would start using central plaza. But if skateboarding wasn't the reason itself in first as stated above this action would not be effective.
There is also a possibility that shoppers who earlier were coming to central plaza due to some special discounts, facilities or ambience they posses, these shoppers might also find a good place in the city which they had not been explored earlier as they were shopping only from central plaza. If they had got good facilities and ambience with great discount as well in some other place it might be difficult to attract them into central plaza again. In that case we also need to consider some changes in the advertising policy of central plaza so they more new customers could be engaged to them and they could reach the pinnacle again as they were once before.
There are many faults in the action that is being taken, we should always consider the every aspect of the problem which had not been done in the passage as clearly stated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'explain'
Suggestion: explain
...oarding and decrement of shoppers. They explains it because of amount of litter and prop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... destruction has been increased in years due to skateboarding. In the end they al...
^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend prohibiting'.
Suggestion: recommend prohibiting
... to skateboarding. In the end they also recommend to prohibit the skateboarding to increase the busin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 375, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...owing the garbage into respective bins. Since there has been no other information on ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have been' or 'be'?
Suggestion: have been; be
...introducing the skateboarding had might been the coincidence only. Author is never t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 227, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun situation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many situations'.
Suggestion: many situations
... this thing and which could be wrong in many situation. Such as people had stopped coming to f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...tion. Such as people had stopped coming to few stores only and they are blaming sk...
^^
Line 4, column 349, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...blaming skateboarding for that. We also dont know how much store owners do belive in...
^^^^
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... store owners do belive in this reason? If there had been only a few who are getti...
^^
Line 4, column 524, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ing is not the problem in any scenario. so any decision should be based upon relia...
^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...ing central plaza. But if skateboarding wasnt the reason itself in first as stated ab...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'while', 'such as', 'talking about']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.20462633452 0.25644967241 80% => OK
Verbs: 0.215302491103 0.15541462614 139% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0693950177936 0.0836205057962 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0747330960854 0.0520304965353 144% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0373665480427 0.0272364105082 137% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.133451957295 0.125424944231 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0996441281139 0.0416121511921 239% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.62713854426 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0213523131673 0.026700313972 80% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.108540925267 0.113004496875 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0266903914591 0.0255425247493 104% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0195729537367 0.0127820249294 153% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3158.0 2731.13054187 116% => OK
No of words: 535.0 446.07635468 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90280373832 6.12365571057 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.57801047555 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.317757009346 0.378187486979 84% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.235514018692 0.287650121315 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.160747663551 0.208842608468 77% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.106542056075 0.135150697306 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62713854426 2.79052419416 94% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 207.018472906 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.422429906542 0.469332199767 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.8733484927 52.1807786196 94% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.039408867 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.2608695652 23.2022227129 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4018309579 57.7814097925 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.304347826 141.986410481 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2608695652 23.2022227129 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.434782608696 0.724660767414 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 5.14285714286 136% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 3.58251231527 307% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 46.8122714344 51.9672348444 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.33695652174 1.8405768891 73% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.542736582338 0.441005458295 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127061337256 0.135418324435 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0835993603076 0.0829849096947 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.593216974482 0.58762219726 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.160813986118 0.147661913831 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217724524069 0.193483328276 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139763255054 0.0970749176394 144% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.300000552284 0.42659136922 70% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0988750112629 0.0774707102158 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.362149414223 0.312017818177 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114081870338 0.0698173142475 163% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.33743842365 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.82512315271 124% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 6.46551724138 124% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 5.36822660099 112% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.82389162562 106% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.