pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
The author states that a pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other sign of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food and determined that all chemicals found in the food were chemicals that are approved for use in pet food. Thus, the recalled food was not responsible for these symptoms, and the company should not devote further resources to the investigation.
I appreciate that the company immediately came into action and without thinking much recalled all 4 million pounds of food. However, they could have arranged a fast investigation in parallel to this recall process. The fast investigation would take a sample of food and test it which the company eventually did. Having done this, company would know that their food was not the actual reason for the problem with the pets, hence saving millions of dollars to the company.
Appreciating that company immediately called back the food and then investigated, author substantiates that the company should not devote further resources to the investigation. I completely disagree with author and the assumptions. Pet's life is more important that anything at this scenario. Company should further investigate and find the reason for the symptoms. They may collaborate with the concerned government organization or any NGO working for the betterment of animals. This would help them financially and morally.
Life of pets should not be taken inconsequential. They are equally important as humans. Author's assumption that if their product was not responsible for the symptoms then they should not carry on with the investigation is wrong. Also, author has assumed that it is the chemicals which might result the symptoms. However, I feel they have ignored the packaging of the product. Company might have changed the packing of the product and the new packaging might have some chemical which might be hazardous to animal's life. Packaging and its quality plays a vital role in product shipment.
There are cases when product reacts with packing material and its chemical reactions results in deadly component which has life threatening implications on the consumer. For example, dog biscuits may react with packing material and form a thin film of dangerous chemical on the biscuits which dogs eventually consume and fall prey to it.
Therefore, we can infer that company should continue with the investigation and find out the root of the symptoms. Money is not everything, life is more important. However, I appreciate that company recalled the product immediately after receiving complaints. Further investigation will be more helpful.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'thus', 'for example', 'i feel']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.2625 0.25644967241 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.160416666667 0.15541462614 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0541666666667 0.0836205057962 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0604166666667 0.0520304965353 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0375 0.0272364105082 138% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.104166666667 0.125424944231 83% => OK
Participles: 0.0416666666667 0.0416121511921 100% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84605527251 2.79052419416 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0145833333333 0.026700313972 55% => OK
Particles: 0.00416666666667 0.001811407834 230% => OK
Determiners: 0.116666666667 0.113004496875 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0375 0.0255425247493 147% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.01875 0.0127820249294 147% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2765.0 2731.13054187 101% => OK
No of words: 439.0 446.07635468 98% => OK
Chars per words: 6.29840546697 6.12365571057 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.57801047555 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.382687927107 0.378187486979 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.316628701595 0.287650121315 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.220956719818 0.208842608468 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.143507972665 0.135150697306 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84605527251 2.79052419416 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 207.018472906 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469248291572 0.469332199767 100% => OK
Word variations: 51.9122497979 52.1807786196 99% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.039408867 130% => OK
Sentence length: 16.8846153846 23.2022227129 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5051996552 57.7814097925 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.346153846 141.986410481 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8846153846 23.2022227129 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.423076923077 0.724660767414 58% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.58251231527 0% => OK
Readability: 48.5474855441 51.9672348444 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.58064516129 1.8405768891 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.609341906127 0.441005458295 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115112960671 0.135418324435 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.116399582637 0.0829849096947 140% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.511303235829 0.58762219726 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.196414324284 0.147661913831 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200192960056 0.193483328276 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.195884160811 0.0970749176394 202% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.389200854594 0.42659136922 91% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.161008163149 0.0774707102158 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.377525048277 0.312017818177 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.235965892702 0.0698173142475 338% => Less connections among paragraphs
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.33743842365 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.82512315271 187% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 5.36822660099 112% => OK
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.82389162562 248% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.