Provide argument against the statement of author.
The author of the memorandum is concerned with the declining numbers of viewers of a late-night news program. He believes that in order to attract more viewers to the program and to avoid further advertising revenues, they should restore the time devoted to weather and local news to its previous level. I think his argument is flawed as he has not ruled out many other factors regarding the loss of viewers and advertising contracts.
First of all, the author assumes that "the complaints of the viewers regarding their station's coverage of weather and local news" and "cancelling of the advertising contracts" are comparable outcomes. He has not considered the other factors which may have lead to cancellation of advertising contracts by local businesses. For example, as the late night news program is quite late,most people like to sleep at that time, and the advertisements during that late time may not have much effect in the sales of those business, so they may have decided to cut their marketing budget there. It has nothing to do with the viewers complaints about lack of program time of weather and local news.
Also, the author mentions "most of the complaints" , where the term 'most' has no quantitative value provided for it. He has not given any idea about the number of complaints or the total viewer count of the late-night program in that particular city.
Furthermore, as this late-night program include national news, it is possible that he television station is broadcasted to multiple cities or states. The author has not even mentioned if the complaints are of a particular locality or multiple localities. If so, then there is no criteria to tell the demographic of coverage of television station and the corresponding complaints i.e. if they are from whole area or a localized area.
Hence in order to augment his argument, the author should consider providing quantitative data for comparison. Only word "most" does not justify his argument. Also he should consider the two outcomes of "the complaints of the viewers regarding their station's coverage of weather and local news" and "cancelling of the advertising contracts" in different lights and not rule out alternative possibilities for the them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mparable outcomes. He has not considered the other factors which may have lead to...
^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , most
...he late night news program is quite late,most people like to sleep at that time, and ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tions 'most of the complaints' , where the term most has no quantitative...
^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no criteria'?
Suggestion: there are no criteria
...ity or multiple localities. If so, then there is no criteria to tell the demographic of coverage of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...from whole area or a localized area. Hence in order to augment his argument, the a...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...st' does not justify his argument. Also he should consider the two outcomes of ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o he should consider the two outcomes of 'the complaints of the viewers rega...
^^^
Line 9, column 441, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
... rule out alternative possibilities for the them.
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'for example', 'i think', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.283062645012 0.25644967241 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.120649651972 0.15541462614 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0812064965197 0.0836205057962 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0417633410673 0.0520304965353 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0487238979118 0.0272364105082 179% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.118329466357 0.125424944231 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0324825986079 0.0416121511921 78% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.15178184719 2.79052419416 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0278422273782 0.026700313972 104% => OK
Particles: 0.00232018561485 0.001811407834 128% => OK
Determiners: 0.0974477958237 0.113004496875 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0139211136891 0.0255425247493 55% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0046403712297 0.0127820249294 36% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2298.0 2731.13054187 84% => OK
No of words: 367.0 446.07635468 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.26158038147 6.12365571057 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.57801047555 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.365122615804 0.378187486979 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.313351498638 0.287650121315 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.228882833787 0.208842608468 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.171662125341 0.135150697306 127% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15178184719 2.79052419416 113% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 207.018472906 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49591280654 0.469332199767 106% => OK
Word variations: 52.6202020092 52.1807786196 101% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.039408867 80% => OK
Sentence length: 22.9375 23.2022227129 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3773113484 57.7814097925 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.625 141.986410481 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9375 23.2022227129 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.724660767414 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 3.58251231527 223% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 54.2726498638 51.9672348444 104% => OK
Elegance: 2.05494505495 1.8405768891 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305700464466 0.441005458295 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.143641596462 0.135418324435 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0605970029652 0.0829849096947 73% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.589951818277 0.58762219726 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.138322307874 0.147661913831 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149775864058 0.193483328276 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904111499513 0.0970749176394 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.422423049982 0.42659136922 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.148102252787 0.0774707102158 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231437721696 0.312017818177 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332738917212 0.0698173142475 48% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.87684729064 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.82512315271 83% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 8.0 5.36822660099 149% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.82389162562 142% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 14.657635468 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.