Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch's $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago I listed my home with Fitch, and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams Realty."
With the information provided, the assumption leading to conclusion remains unfounded. This argument is well presented yet far-fetched. This assumptions claims that tow real estate firm in town and compare attribute of each other. Besides, the conclusion's author is based on that selling home quickly and a good price we should utilize Adams Realty. Hence, the conclusion is ill- founded.
The primary assumptions underlying that makes author assumption that situation of Adams Realty is better than Fitch Realty. Nevertheless, he fails to preclude other possibility reason that we should consider to information about qualification and work experience of agents of each firm. The number of agent and number of hours per week is considerably crucial. A part time is more effective compared than full-time. Want of such prudent answers makes the author assumptions full of holes. So to reinforce the argument should have discussed about information of agent and their skills.
Furthermore, the author of the assumptions avers that provided that you want to sell your house as soon as possible at a great price, you should utilize Adams Realty. However, he fails to take other possible reason into account. As a matter of fact, we know that all factors effect in selling such as location, size, position, legal documents. In fact the variety criteria have impact for selling. So, to reinforce the argument the author should have discussed about other factors which is considerably effective for this event.
Moreover, the author of the statement does not imply to service charge and price range of home. Without considering and ruling makes the author assumptions. He should have discussed about financial analysis, time required by firm.
In short, as discussed, the lack of assumptions the several vital evidence can be enumerated above. The conclusion cannot be tenable. On the other hand to make a rigid conclusion is very myopic observations method. After all, feckless attempt, with a fallible method could not be a fool's errand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...ment is well presented yet far-fetched. This assumptions claims that tow real estate...
^^^^
Line 2, column 154, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'claim'.
Suggestion: claim
...ented yet far-fetched. This assumptions claims that tow real estate firm in town and c...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...urs per week is considerably crucial. A part time is more effective compared than full-ti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'observations'' or 'observation's'?
Suggestion: observations'; observation's
... make a rigid conclusion is very myopic observations method. After all, feckless attempt, wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 282, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'fools'' or 'fool's'?
Suggestion: fools'; fool's
..., with a fallible method could not be a fools errand.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, after all, in fact, in short, such as, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 324.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3024691358 5.12650576532 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79172766075 2.78398813304 100% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 204.123752495 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.468620217663 119% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0306913773 57.8364921388 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.6956521739 119.503703932 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0869565217 23.324526521 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86956521739 5.70786347227 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100353130321 0.218282227539 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258137579072 0.0743258471296 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433213899498 0.0701772020484 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0537590073482 0.128457276422 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416221069243 0.0628817314937 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.3799401198 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.3550499002 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.197005988 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.32208582834 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 98.500998004 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.