Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
It is debatable whether universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. Although, some people consider it is a waste of time. I certainly agree with this policy.
Firstly, studying the other fields will give you a boarder understanding of your subject. For instance, both chemistry and physics are considered molecules as one of their subject. Nevertheless, they approach the same subject from different angles. When studying these smallest parts of substances from two sides, you will have a full understanding of them.
Secondly, with the booming development in most of the fields including science, economic and others. We observe more and more achievement attained when combined two or more fields of study. Bioinformatics is one of the most successful examples. With a huge of amount of information contained in humans gene, it is impossible to manually analyze the function of each gene segment.
Admittedly, it is a waste of your time and resource if you can not find anything related to your own field of study or learning more than you need. However, it is a problem of planning and your tutor can help to find the suitable courses for you.
In conclusion, although it can have a negative effect, I strongly aver that the policy is useful even can open new opportunities for us due to the reasons mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...es outside the students field of study. Although, some people consider it is a waste of ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.6327345309 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 28.8173652695 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 2260.96107784 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 231.0 441.139720559 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03896103896 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.56307096286 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87155619362 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 204.123752495 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.468620217663 133% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 705.55239521 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.471057884232 212% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.17862289 57.8364921388 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1428571429 119.503703932 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 23.324526521 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 5.70786347227 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297203095759 0.218282227539 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839340909588 0.0743258471296 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121669722653 0.0701772020484 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1451063543 0.128457276422 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103809470712 0.0628817314937 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.3799401198 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.5979740519 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 98.500998004 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 12.3882235529 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.