Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author argues that in order to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, which may otherwise be developed for economic gain, nations should pass relative laws. While I offer adequate agreement with the author to some extent, this issue couldn’t be settled so simply once and for all, especially after a close scrutiny, which might lead to unexpected consequences.
Nevertheless, these areas could be vulnerable to be damaged with the development of technology unless nations make laws against occupying any remaining wilderness areas for utility of industry, laboratory,...
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 541 350
No. of Characters: 2692 1500
No. of Different Words: 272 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.823 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.976 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.618 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 188 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 144 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 90 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 65 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 36.067 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 14.622 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.933 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.349 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.593 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.065 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5