The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training. Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects,

Essay topics:

The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields is more a matter of personality than of training. Different interpretations come about when people with different personalities look at exactly the same objects, facts, data, or events and see different things.

It is true that the way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields differs from person to person.For some ,personality plays an important role and for the others training may have a greater impact on their interpretation.For instance,people knew apple as a fruit for ages,but none of them visualized that how important a role it would play in explaining answers for many important questions related to the universe until Newton thought about it.It is definitely because of Newton and his interpretations the Newton's laws were deduced. It is difficult to take a side and support as it depends on the person,their interest to pursue the subject and the depth of the subject they are dealing with.

Newton did not undergo any training ,but only his interpretations lead him through the entire process of his invention.Like this, there were many inventions and discoveries made by common people.Interpretations also can depend on optimism and pessimism.Einstein who was alleged or may be truly autistic made a heterogeneous mixture which was considered poisonous by his neighbors lead to the invention of the bulb.Here again we can clearly notice the difference in personality ,and Einstein did not undergo any training as he never went to school.

And, the tech icons like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates were college dropouts.Yet,they managed to bring about the greatest revolutions in the computer field.But, on the other hand,there are people like Dennis Ritchie who invented machine language C underwent rigorous training in his field.And,this invention is no less when compared to other.

When there is a continuous exchange of ideas,discussions and arguements about them amongst the trained and novice , the greatest of inventions take place.And when personality and training go hand in hand , definitely the scholars or students will excel in their academic fields.At the end of the day,the materials today were yesterday's interpretations.

In a nutshell,both matter and personality play a positive effect in the interpretation.And interpretations,thoughts when shared with people and commented by critics can still be improved.As ,the scholars can now think from the critic's point of view.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (5 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Sentence: It is true that the way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic fields differs from person to person.For some ,personality plays an important role and for the others training may have a greater impact on their interpretation.For instance,people knew apple as a fruit for ages,but none of them visualized that how important a role it would play in explaining answers for many important questions related to the universe until Newton thought about it.It is
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to others and training
Description: The fragment them visualized that is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace visualized with verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive

Sentence: When there is a continuous exchange of ideas,discussions and arguements about them amongst the trained and novice , the greatest of inventions take place.And when personality and training go hand in hand , definitely the scholars or students will excel in their academic fields.At the end of the day,the materials today were yesterday's interpretations.
Error: arguements Suggestion: arguments

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 8 15
No. of Words: 372 350
No. of Characters: 1842 1500
No. of Different Words: 202 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.392 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.952 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.844 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 127 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 102 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 76 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 42 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 46.5 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 26.679 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.398 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.749 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.144 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5