TO ACHIEVE SUCCESS, ONE MUST REJECT CONVENTIONAL THINKING
Success is when you complete the objective or meet the required goal. On the other hand, it also refers that when a person is successful he leads a cosy comfortable life for himself and family. Thus, success has various connotations. To achieve success, one must reject conventional thinking is unconvincing.
People who achieve success are those who follow the traditionally accepted standards. The conventional mode of thinking is one that has been followed and tested by the people for generations. The flaws in it are also rectified by the people. There are still conventions that has not been constituted into law, but still needs to be followed to lead a successful life. There are countless number of people who follow a successful life. Particularly it could be the neighbor living next door and even us who wish to achieve success in a short span rather than trying new notions where you take chance every time.
Unconventional thinking to be literal is being out of ordinary. It is not guaranteed that those who follow unconventionally may be succeed. There are few who deserved success by this mode. For instance, Charles Babbage who is known for the father of computing, because of his thinking apart from accepted standards was able to come up with the invention of computers
From the view above, there are quite a few individuals in our society who has succeeded in their life by breaking the disciplines and ideas that has been static for a long time. The bottom line is that you have to integrate the existing conventions with your own ideas to achieve success so that the risk of going against the convention is settled by the set of conventions you have decided to follow
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, thus, apart from, as to, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 289.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87889273356 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81043421678 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539792387543 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.5407192076 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2666666667 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356516329651 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14056319968 0.0831039109588 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.207223576262 0.0758088955206 273% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222837988648 0.150359130593 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13308065513 0.0667264976115 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.