All students should be required to take the driver's education course at Centerville High School. In the past two years, several accidents in and around Centerville have involved teenage drivers. Since a number of parents in Centerville have complained that they are too busy to teach their teenagers to drive, some other instruction is necessary to ensure that these teenagers are safe drivers. Although there are two driving schools in Centerville, parents on a tight budget cannot afford to pay for driving instruction. Therefore an effective and mandatory program sponsored by the high school is the only solution to this serious problem."
The author concludes that there is an exigent need of an effective and compulsory driver's education programme for all the students sponsored by the Centreville's High School. The evidence cited to support this argument are data of the accidents from previous years, time shortage of the parents and budget of the parents. However, the premises are unable to justify or strengthen the weak conclusion. The main reasons why the argument is rendered inconclusive are authenticity of the data, fallacious assumptions and less information.
Firstly, the argument assumes that in the past two years the accidents involving teenagers around Centerville are increasing, but the author doesn't mentioned the correct figures regarding how many of them are actually studying in the Centreville High School i.e. what if they are from some other school and if they are from other school then the accidents will still going to happen even if the driving teaching programme become mandatory. Also, the author didn't mentioned about the cause of the accidents, that whether it is due to the lack of skills or negligence of the drivers. So, the author need to provide the actual figures of the students to corroborate his argument otherwise it is inconclusive.
Secondly, the author said that there is shortage of time for the parents so they can't give driving lessons to the students, but the author haven't mentioned about the actual time required by the students to take the lessons. Furthermore, every student has different grasping power, so some need less time to grasp the the things and some need more. A weak student need more time to learn the same thing whereas an adroit kid can get the same thing in minute amount of time. So, it depends on the cognitive power of the student which varies from student to student. Additionally, parents are the first teacher of their kids so they will learn best from their parents and no one is that much busy in their lives that they can't even teach their children. So, the argument is inconclusive.
Last but not the least the author said that although there are two driving schools in Centerville but they can't afford that schools because of low budgets, but the author haven't even mentioned about the actual income of the parents and the driving fee of both the schools. What if the driving fee of both the schools is very low and they can actually afford? So, there is lack of information about the income of the parents which make the argument inconclusive.
So at the end the argument is full of fallacious assumptions, lack of data and authenticity of the data is also not given which renders the argument inconclusive. The author need to provide more data in order to makle this argument conclusive
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'drivers'' or 'driver's'?
Suggestion: drivers'; driver's
...ent need of an effective and compulsory drivers education programme for all the student...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...terville are increasing, but the author doesnt mentioned the correct figures regarding...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 368, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'go'
Suggestion: go
...er school then the accidents will still going to happen even if the driving teaching ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...amme become mandatory. Also, the author didnt mentioned about the cause of the accide...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hortage of time for the parents so they cant give driving lessons to the students, b...
^^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...lessons to the students, but the author havent mentioned about the actual time require...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... power, so some need less time to grasp the the things and some need more. A weak stude...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... power, so some need less time to grasp the the things and some need more. A weak stude...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 719, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...that much busy in their lives that they cant even teach their children. So, the argu...
^^^^
Line 4, column 108, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...driving schools in Centerville but they cant afford that schools because of low budg...
^^^^
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
... because of low budgets, but the author havent even mentioned about the actual income ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2274.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90086206897 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61861518962 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.431034482759 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.9000687414 60.3974514979 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.21951772744 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151398820029 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434309911044 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475880318638 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0852570396505 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465569506128 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.