All too often companies hire outside Consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were spending more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your response for the position you take in developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statements stated here suggest that instead of hiring outside consultants for the company to operate more efficiently a better solution would be companies listening the suggestions of their own employees. This is not a valid argument.
Hiring outside consultants have a number of merits. First of all such consultants are trained specifically in improving the various process and aspects of the functioning of the organisation so as to make it more efficient and productive. As they have formal training and have expertise in the matter of consultancy, they will be handy and useful.
Another advantage of hiring the outside consultants are that as they are not a part of the organisation, therefore they will be looking at each and every situation with an indifferent and an objective view. The employees on the other hand would try to make suggestions and changes that will ease their job and would have a limited scope limiting to their own department.
The consultants, as mentioned above would be indifferent and would look at the bigger picture of improving the overall efficiency and productivity of the organisation. Also the outside consultants bring along with them a different point of view and different approaches which may not be thought by the existing employee.
As the consultants keep on associating with different companies they can improve a company's efficiency by modelling a plan which worked in some other organisation. They can use their own expereince for the benefit of the organisation.
All the things mentioned above just give an edge to the outside consultants then the existing employees. But one cannot generalise and their could be a possibility that all the above suggestions can be implemented by the employees without the help of an outside consultant. It is just that the consultants are formally trained and are experts in the domain of consultancy so they have a edge and are preffered by the organisations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... of the functioning of the organisation so as to make it more efficient and productive. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...y and productivity of the organisation. Also the outside consultants bring along wit...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...be thought by the existing employee. As the consultants keep on associating wit...
^^
Line 11, column 386, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... the domain of consultancy so they have a edge and are preffered by the organisat...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'as to', 'first of all', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.202380952381 0.240241500013 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.16369047619 0.157235817809 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0863095238095 0.0880659088768 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0535714285714 0.0497285424764 108% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0446428571429 0.0444667217837 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.133928571429 0.12292977631 109% => OK
Participles: 0.0625 0.0406280797675 154% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.11188587662 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Infinitives: 0.014880952381 0.030933414821 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.145833333333 0.0997080785238 146% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0416666666667 0.0249443105267 167% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00892857142857 0.0148568991511 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1962.0 2732.02544248 72% => OK
No of words: 318.0 452.878318584 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16981132075 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345911949686 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305031446541 0.280924506359 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216981132075 0.200843997647 108% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.194968553459 0.132149295362 148% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11188587662 2.79330140395 111% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 219.290929204 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468553459119 0.48968727796 96% => OK
Word variations: 46.6167214067 55.4138127331 84% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 22.7142857143 23.380412469 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5014510198 59.4972553346 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.142857143 141.124799967 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 23.380412469 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 0.674092028746 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 53.2174303684 51.4728631049 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.52272727273 1.64882698954 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274126794988 0.391690518653 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.147656817038 0.123202303941 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.084927876101 0.077325440228 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.671493676052 0.547984918172 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159980274289 0.149214159877 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131591145494 0.161403998019 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948119893391 0.0892212321368 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.347265728351 0.385218514788 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0706504372351 0.0692045440612 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193805424743 0.275328986314 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823708723001 0.0653680567796 126% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.5995575221 88% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.