Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
The author claims that for leader wise moral judgement is an critical factors rather than ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers like presidents of other countries. In the following, however, it sahll be argued that while moral judgement is important to some degree, capability to maintain good relationship with other leaders is also necessary for leaders.
Admittedly, from a historical perspective, we could find several characteristics who made their country or city destroyed by their greed or unwise thought. For example, many of us heard several times about Romans' lavish culture such as expensive tubs, a large playground for watching crude race (sinners vs. solders) or else. We do not credit the lavish leaders for effective leaders. The Clinton-Lewinsky scandal is also good example for how important moral judjement of leaders is. Because of this, he is remembered as characteristics of scandal not as effective leaders. Therefore, history seems to indicate that a moral judgement is criteria for effective leaders.
Nevertheless, ability to consider and decide moral judgement is not just sole factor determinationg leaders's ability. Having a good relationship is also important factors for political leaders to sustain nations. For examples, during initial time for speread COVID-19, many of Koreans required the Korean government to ban any Chineses from entrying Incheon airport. But, President Moon Jae In and his fellows thought it as cutting off the relationship with China and Chinises leader, Xi jinping. So Korean government maintained the relationship with China and keep contact with Chineses leaders and it may be helpful to keep two countries' economical and political relationship. Addditionaly, Israel is also famous about relationship with USA. The relationship with USA gave them military guard and political boundaries. It is also good example for indicating that ability to maintain the repect of his or her peers is also important.
To summarize, ability to keep sincere relationship with leaders' peers is important as well as sound moral judgement for being effective leaders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The author claims that for leader wise m...
^^
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...that for leader wise moral judgement is an critical factors rather than ability to...
^^
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'factor'?
Suggestion: factor
...der wise moral judgement is an critical factors rather than ability to maintain the res...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... leaders is also necessary for leaders. Admittedly, from a historical perspectiv...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt is criteria for effective leaders. Nevertheless, ability to consider and de...
^^^
Line 3, column 939, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of his or her peers is also important. To summarize, ability to keep sincere re...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45592705167 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02018168316 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544072948328 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1952378498 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7222222222 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2777777778 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298041728431 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973095037263 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0949766413468 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227074443637 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.086261773977 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.