In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
A person is said to be an expert if, he is able to identify and solve all problems in his field. On other hand, a neophyte is a person who is new to the field and has no prior experience in it. So, it is more likely that an expert will provide significant contributions than the beginner.
Expertise in any field is achieved by thorough understanding of the subject as well as having hands on experience on it for some time. For example, a “Java Programmer” will be considered to be an expert in programming field only if; he is able to complete a given task in stipulated time as well as using a proper programming logic. This programmer possessing the knowledge of using correct programming technique and producing redundant less code is more likely to contribute significantly than a fresher.
As the old saying goes on “One often learns from his mistakes” meaning that unless and until a person makes an error, he won’t be able to get detailed knowledge of his subject. Similarly, it is possible to tackle a situation if we have gone through it previously. This increases chances of an expert to make significant contributions since; he may have faced extremely tough situations and is able to assess them in a proper manner. Whereas, a beginner may get nervous if he is put under pressure and might lose his cool.
Contributions can also be achieved by inspiring from previous works. So, only an expert will be able to understand the flaws in the previous works and be able to rectify them. A fresher might get inspired from previous works but, since there is paucity of knowledge, he might not be able to contribute in a significant manner that an expert would. For example an expert in data analysis field can identify flaws in the previous technologies, like inaccuracy of the data, failure to handle large volume of data etc. because, he might have used them in the past whereas, a fresher might only know the existence of such technology and cannot identify its flaws.
Also, it is true that once we find a way to solve a problem, we always prefer them to tackle in the future but, this limits our thinking capacity. A fresher having no prior knowledge is more likely to think in a different way and this might lead to significant contributions. However, possibility of such contributions is very less.
So, it can be said that an expert can contribute in a more significant than a beginner would.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper manner" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...h situations and is able to assess them in a proper manner. Whereas, a beginner may get nervous if...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 303, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a significant manner" with adverb for "significant"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...dge, he might not be able to contribute in a significant manner that an expert would. For example an ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 208, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...prior knowledge is more likely to think in a different way and this might lead to significant cont...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...more significant than a beginner would.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'well', 'whereas', 'for example', 'as well as', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.201716738197 0.240241500013 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.169527896996 0.157235817809 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0858369098712 0.0880659088768 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0622317596567 0.0497285424764 125% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0579399141631 0.0444667217837 130% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124463519313 0.12292977631 101% => OK
Participles: 0.0364806866953 0.0406280797675 90% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86267569081 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0386266094421 0.030933414821 125% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.107296137339 0.0997080785238 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0386266094421 0.0249443105267 155% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00214592274678 0.0148568991511 14% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2432.0 2732.02544248 89% => OK
No of words: 425.0 452.878318584 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72235294118 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.58838876751 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.322352941176 0.366273622748 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.225882352941 0.280924506359 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.185882352941 0.200843997647 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.117647058824 0.132149295362 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86267569081 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 219.290929204 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463529411765 0.48968727796 95% => OK
Word variations: 50.6032444899 55.4138127331 91% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.3684210526 23.380412469 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2917462727 59.4972553346 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 141.124799967 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3684210526 23.380412469 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.631578947368 0.674092028746 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 44.9566563467 51.4728631049 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.25185185185 1.64882698954 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445080487326 0.391690518653 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.121478620717 0.123202303941 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0819396880051 0.077325440228 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.571768282977 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15712323352 0.149214159877 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169498601137 0.161403998019 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077840666481 0.0892212321368 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.261366304422 0.385218514788 68% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0946141055131 0.0692045440612 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270410349593 0.275328986314 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777584165697 0.0653680567796 119% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.