Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may be proven false in the future.
The author in the above issue suggest to mistrust any information consider as fact. I am totally in agreement with the author view. Thus, there seems no loop for the author view. There are multiple reason for my acceptances with the author view. I would like to state it in above paragraph.
First of all, the author says to mistrust any information obtain as fact as in future it can be proved wrong. For example, few decades ago there was no existences of the life on the mars planet. As the advancement in the research took place, so the view for it also changed. Thus from the piece of fact which gives information might be proven wrong tomorrow. Moreover, there are multiple reason to prompt my approval.
Secondly, the invention and advancement is the basic nature of the today’s generation. Human thinking never stop and the advancement in the technology will thus will lead way for the betterment of the individual. For example, disease like cancer were incurable previously. With the advancement, this disease has also become curable. Thus on the specific information of today, we cannot make conclusion for tomorrow. Thus due to above reason, I am in totally agreement with that of the author. However, a piece an information may lead to a fact. Moreover, it is easily said than it to be done. So to relate totally on the fact of today maybe dangerous of tomorrow.
Thirdly, during ancient age, there were many myths which where consider as a matter of the fact are overcome in today’s generation. Thus there seems no disproval with the view of the author. Transformation is rule of the nature, so the with this transformation we cannot make sure to that of the future,
Further, I would like to wrap my discussion over this issue and bulk all above evidence. The fact of the information today can lead to the progression of the tomorrow. To trust on the specific information today is totally unreliable. As it might be proven wrong in tomorrow. Thus I am in completely acceptance with that of author.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...place, so the view for it also changed. Thus from the piece of fact which gives info...
^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
..., this disease has also become curable. Thus on the specific information of today, w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...we cannot make conclusion for tomorrow. Thus due to above reason, I am in totally ag...
^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...re overcome in today's generation. Thus there seems no disproval with the view ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nformation today is totally unreliable. As it might be proven wrong in tomorrow. T...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s it might be proven wrong in tomorrow. Thus I am in completely acceptance with that...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tely acceptance with that of author.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'for example', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.240694789082 0.240241500013 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.12158808933 0.157235817809 77% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0521091811414 0.0880659088768 59% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0719602977667 0.0497285424764 145% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0397022332506 0.0444667217837 89% => OK
Prepositions: 0.14888337469 0.12292977631 121% => OK
Participles: 0.0198511166253 0.0406280797675 49% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.78915684722 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.029776674938 0.030933414821 96% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.124069478908 0.0997080785238 124% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0272952853598 0.0249443105267 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00744416873449 0.0148568991511 50% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2028.0 2732.02544248 74% => OK
No of words: 350.0 452.878318584 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79428571429 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.3 0.366273622748 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.228571428571 0.280924506359 81% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182857142857 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131428571429 0.132149295362 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78915684722 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 219.290929204 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437142857143 0.48968727796 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.3334599925 55.4138127331 80% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6194690265 126% => OK
Sentence length: 13.4615384615 23.380412469 58% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2983774868 59.4972553346 58% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 141.124799967 55% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4615384615 23.380412469 58% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.538461538462 0.674092028746 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 36.3186813187 51.4728631049 71% => OK
Elegance: 1.75531914894 1.64882698954 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38995896743 0.391690518653 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.102182777635 0.123202303941 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0904860621532 0.077325440228 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.468213970564 0.547984918172 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159594462175 0.149214159877 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147239976427 0.161403998019 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0995172076456 0.0892212321368 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.494735492135 0.385218514788 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0378873294533 0.0692045440612 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286749400083 0.275328986314 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815585064565 0.0653680567796 125% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.