To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards.
In this statement, an assumption exist which is that being an effective leader is paralleled to being ethical and moral. However, the latter can be refuted since an elected individual can rule without necessarily possessing those core values.
While guiding a nation and under certain circumstances, morals may be spared, but do not necessarily undermine the quality of the work conducted. For instance, an on duty public official may perform exemplary work and display ethical demeanor while on a more personal level may be having an immoral affair. This particular instance was the center of a scandal during George Bush’s presidential mandate. He broke the sacred vows of marriage, but independently of his work for this nation. He created a legacy that was untarnished by immoral personal conduct. Would this fact lessen the severity of his actions or brought tolerance to adultery? Certainly not. However, his skills as a leader were not affected by his inappropriate personal conduct.
Furthermore, a leader who has the audacity to make dishonorable decision may be an increasingly triumphant one. In fact, part of the responsibility of a ruler is the need to make difficult decision and compromise in ways some may consider unethical but still deemed necessary. During a catastrophic natural event, such as a tsunami, it is up to our public representative to dispatch emergency teams often adjudicating on the number of casualties. The moral view embodies the idea of saving every life as every individual is precious. However, with limited resources, strategic and dishonorable moves may be decided to limit costs, damages while saving as much lives as possible. This compromised position, while debatable, may be more productive than using all men power and financial resources carelessly without prioritizing.
Nevertheless, there is an undeniable saying that people need to live by example. In order to inspire, guide and lead a nation with as much positive outcomes as possible, society seeks righteous man with integrity. Never were candidates for elections promoted as unethical though robust and aggressive. It goes without saying that society labeled a good leader as one with ethical principles. The thought process being that embezzlement, trickery and lies would be less likely to become the norm and dominate governments. True character often reflect on a person’s action and precaution against corruption, violence and tyranny are taken by choosing a ruler of honorable principles.
Although ideals and labels dominates the mind of human beings, ethical values do not come hand in hand with successful leadership. Certainly, It could minimize negatives outcome resulting but no assurance can be granted as everyone has a dark side, a secret garden and impulses that is intangible unless allowed to be seen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...to limit costs, damages while saving as much lives as possible. This compromised pos...
^^^^
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'Never' is usually put after the verb 'were'.
Suggestion: Were Never
...ety seeks righteous man with integrity. Never were candidates for elections promoted as un...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, while, for instance, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2398.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 446.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37668161435 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03271656177 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 266.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596412556054 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7784663969 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.260869565 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3913043478 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26086956522 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237858663376 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585127462018 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846648771599 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136408859769 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783763348771 0.0667264976115 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.89 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.