The claim assumes, that best way to prepare youngters for leadership in many fields is to raise in them a sence of cooperation, not competition. It is a hard question and a lot of factors must be reviewed in deciding which way is better.
It is true, that our world is very competitve today. From the kindergarden people are competing with each other, trying to do treir best in schools and universities in order to secure a better jobs, position and overall quality of live for themselves. It is quite understandable, and I think that competition can be beneficial. Only comparing yourself with others, people can understand the level of their abilities, skills and knowledge.
Before anyone can become a leader in any field, he or she must prove, that his or her skills are better, than skill's of any other candidate. Take politics for example. People there have a huge competition between each other, all trying to win supporters and convince them, than they are better then their opponent. Without beeing hightly competitive, no politic figure will be succesfull in his political career. I believe, that it is true for another industries as well.However, some people think, that cooperation is more beneficial to one's success and overall to society. This position is logical and believable as well. In many fields, only with the help of other human can invent or produce something valuable and important. No scientist can work alone, they all need to work with their colleguaes in order to conduct a research. Scientific society share their works between each other and it helps to move the whole industry forwand. In any company in can be true as well. Departments must work together in order to provide an overall profitability of a company. Sometimes, even in such high competitive field as politics people are working together as it can be the only way to warrant specific action.
So, if anybody wants to succeed and fight for a leadership in goverment, industry or any other field, in my opinion, it is advisable to be both competitive and cooperative. Different situation require different action and nobody can stuck with only cooperation or only competition. Leader must be able to use both of these methods depending on the situation.
To sum up, in my opinion claim is neglecting the benefits of competition, praising the cooperation as the preferable way, which is nor neccesserily so. Young people must have both of these sences as it will help them more in their life and prepare them better for leadership
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'better than'?
Suggestion: better than
...orters and convince them, than they are better then their opponent. Without beeing hightly ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...and convince them, than they are better then their opponent. Without beeing hightly ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... is true for another industries as well.However, some people think, that cooperation is...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 539, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... that cooperation is more beneficial to ones success and overall to society. This po...
^^^^
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...th their colleguaes in order to conduct a research. Scientific society share their works b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, well, for example, i think, in my opinion, it is true, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2105.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94131455399 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85409039025 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518779342723 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2814240006 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5217391304 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5217391304 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182987438435 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527718915795 0.0831039109588 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635249959859 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13413069695 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740559388102 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.