Leaders in government, industry or other fields play a central role in development of that particlar field or even beyond the field. Special attention is required to be paid to the preparation of competent leaders due to their high importance. The statement, proposed by the given material, offers two options which are both valuable, if given sound arguments; they both have their pros and cons. The option of competition is appealing to me, because I think that it will help immensely to improve the overall managament of diferernt levels.
Competition is the driving force of develpment. If we look into the concept of competition, it's core idea is the achivement of better resaults, than the rival party. The basis of the competition is the motivation, which is intended to offer benefits for the participants. These benefits exist everywhere people edeveour. While analyzing the question, it becomes apparent that the competition exists in different fields and at various levels, and the objects of competition can vary in size contingent upon the tricktness of the competition.
But why is the competition so important for the leading positions? It is the virtue of the leadershp that drives this importance. Leaders should have stong analytical and critical thinking for them to be able to solve sophisticated tasks. While competeing for a cecrtain position, they not only use these skill, but also adept them.
However, the above described argument were sound for pure competition. If we look futher into the essence of the concept, we can find out that another form of competitio exist, which is precarious. The paries will no benefit if undue methods will be applied in the process of competition. Nevertheless, nowadays many examples of undue competition can be seen, especially in ecnonomis and politics.
To conclude I would like to say that in order to encourige competition for development of leaders in order for the field to thrive, the factor of undue competition should be seriousy taken into consideration, for the incentives to be eficient.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this skill' or 'these skills'?
Suggestion: this skill; these skills
... a cecrtain position, they not only use these skill, but also adept them. However, the ab...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, while, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 334.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18562874251 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00063339675 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568862275449 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.3452367151 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2222222222 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5555555556 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158610460592 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473053129013 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037283146178 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893496002498 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.013243282345 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.