The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The prompt mentioned above is about what is the best way to prepeare and train young people for leadership roles in any field of interest. The main question is what is this best way that the society can adapt to this make the upcoming young generation more suitable for leadership positions - by inculcating a sense of cooperation or competition in them? I strongly agree that the instilling a sense of cooperation in the young minds would make them better leaders than by inclulcating a sense of competition in them.
To begin with, a sense of cooperation will help a person anywhere and anytime. Where ever one goes he or she needs to cooperate with other and work as a team, let it be a workplace or school project wherein students are to work as a team. For example, in a workplace an employee is assigned as a project head of a team by the manager, and given the deadline as end of the week. So, in this scenario, this employee needs to work with his team and not compete with them in order to finish the work on time. He needs to be the leader, and assign everyone their work and make sure they coordinate everything properly. If in this scenario, he chooses to compete, he will want to prove to his other employees that he is an indispensible asset to the company, so he might take up all the work, and does not give any other person the opportunity, which is definitely not a quality of good leader.
Secondly, a true leader will try to motivate the team and encourage them even when times are bad, for which a sense of cooperativeness is arrantly required. For example, lets say there has been made a mistake by one of the team members in a contract which was a million dollar contract is extremely important to the company. Now, a true leader will correct this team member in private, and teach him or her how to fix their mistake and how to find a way out of this predicament. The leader will accept that it was his mistake and not blame the team instead even though it was a blunder made by one his team members. In this scenario, let's say the leader is extremely competitive, now the leader will put all the blame on the team and stigmatize and belittle that particular team member in front of everyone, which is exactly how a leader should not be.
Lastly, some people might say that competition is good as the whole world is cmpetitive. I don't deny it but competition can sometimes be healthy and sometimes not be very healthy. Now what is a healthy competition? A competition that does not evoke a sense of evil in you. Sometimes people get extremely competitive and miss the entire point of it. Competiveness, it could lead to jealousy, hatred between the competitiors and they may end up destroying and annihilating everything they have.
This is not what competitions should bring out in a person.
In conclusion, the best way for a society to prepare the young minds for leadership is by including a sense of cooperativeness and not competition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ood as the whole world is cmpetitive. I dont deny it but competition can sometimes b...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2443.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 535.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56635514019 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76224705112 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.441121495327 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 778.5 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6641207897 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.045454545 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3181818182 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.18181818182 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262364035512 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860194561117 0.0831039109588 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0897568611459 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162908565499 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127646967742 0.0667264976115 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.