The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
In this era of industrialization, the products are being consumed by the people which yield the emission of wastes from the households depending upon a number of products encouraged by the industrialized society. Due to the absence of proper waste management system, this amount of waste affects our environment. If there are proper infrastructures for allocation of household wastes, the environmental contamination due to the overflow of household wastes would be able to be eliminated. However, imposing strict rules & limits on the amount of trash from each household would not be viable rather there should be alternative methods to convert trash into a resource.
Practically, the amount of household trash depends on the size of household, members, the amount of consumption. So the government should overserve & survey the household properties & then estimate the amount of household trash they make & fix a distribution quota. However, it is quite impossible to estimate the amount of household trash accurately produced from surveyed household properties as most of the time reports are false. As an example, the consumers would have a tendency to have larger distribution quota from the government. That`s why it will be a great challenging program for government to limit the emission of household wastes.
Instead of imposing rules & regulations to limit the consumer generated wastes, it would be the wisest idea to use the wastes at its best. For instance, Hydrocarbon can be produced from consumer wastes by which we can produce electricity. In America, the electricity from Hydrocarbon used by 7 million people. Sweden imports consumer wastes to produce electricity by implementing the same technique. Moreover, this electricity from consumer generated wastes increases the economic growth of that country.
Nowadays fertilizers are being produced from the natural decomposition of household wastes. The organic matters extracted from household wastes are being decomposed to produce manure for the cultivation of land which is moreover environment-friendly rather than the usage of artificial & chemical fertilizers. So people should be encouraged and educated about the procedure of composition from household wastes
On the other hand, polystyrene form of wastes from the household can not be used without recycling. Plastic bottles, packets should be dumped into the recycling factories, for instance, Ryan`s Recycling. Besides to reduce the usage of polystyrene, poly bags should be replaced by paper packet, foil paper which are not inimical to the environment.
Though imposing limits on the amount of household generated crashes would not be so viable rather than the implementation of the techniques to use these wastes. Moreover, the government should take appropriate steps to reduce this problem by not imposing any strict rule rather than usability of these wastes by viable implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ods to convert trash into a resource. Practically, the amount of household tra...
^^^
Line 8, column 389, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cated about the procedure of composition from household wastes On the other h...
^^
Line 8, column 412, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re of composition from household wastes On the other hand, polystyrene form of w...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...re not inimical to the environment. Though imposing limits on the amount of househ...
^^^^^^
Line 12, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of these wastes by viable implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 14.8657303371 7% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2499.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62837837838 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20502999736 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463963963964 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 791.1 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9058981933 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338815494288 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114239383919 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502413971233 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181164347877 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064233492019 0.0667264976115 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 48.8420337079 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.