The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which
adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how
these examples shape your position.
Teaching a child can be done in a number of ways and at different places not just in a classroom, as such, there is no one perfect way to teach. However, completely paying deaf ears to negative actions is out of order, as the child will not know the consequences of such action and might be tempted to repeat such since there is no penalty for such act. I therefore, disagree with the prompt that states that appraisal for positive actions and complete negligence of wrong actions is the best way to teach.
Neglecting negative actions can be contrued to mean acceptance. In as much as we might not want to reduce the confidence of a child by strongly penalizing his/her wrong actions, complete negligence to such action is certainly not the best way to go about it as there is a tendency of repeating such doing if completely ignored and as well, other children might also be lured into attempting such action since there is no penalty. The danger of completely giving a deaf ear to wrongdoings is that well-behaved people can be corrupted as well and as such, this wrongdoing will continue to linger.
Consider a workplace for example where Company X is a marketing firm that has marketers that have been given targets to reach at the end of every quarter of the year. A marketer that fails to always meet his/her targets is most times penalized, either by a reduction in salary or some other benefits or even termination of appointment. As such, every marketer is always up and doing to reach their targets to avoid being penalized. Therefore, penalizing wrong acts has a way of consciously making one stay away from such actions and deliberately choosing right over wrong.
In conclusion, In as much as positive actions are praised, Negative actions should be cautioned and not given deaf ears in order to avoid the spread of such action by other people and also to keep people in check to consciously eschew wrongdoings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 554, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le can be corrupted as well and as such, this wrongdoing will continue to linger....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 337.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72403560831 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69845373569 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495548961424 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.4251916409 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.727272727 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6363636364 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130975021896 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062196418836 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663278181468 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906670052185 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560276926847 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.69 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.