"The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones."
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain the reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The above statement is itself a contentious one. While many believe that an optimistic and positive vision towards a particular action brings self confidence, others have a discordant view. Here, I will argue to the fact that “over-confidence” follows “over-positivity”. A person, specifically when teaching, should keep equilibrium between the positive and counter-positive actions without ignoring either of them.
One cogent reason for my belief comes from automobile history. In 1920s, Francis W. Davis worked at an automobile company and noticed the difficulty in handling the hard steering while driving. He left the company and, keeping in mind the consecutive negative action, made the very first power steering, which exemplified how a negative action can lead to new and innovative ideas.
Furthermore, if parents or trainers keep commemorating a child’s achievements and positive deeds, while ignoring the negative actions, he/she will not be able to judge between right and wrong and thus, will create a false idea that “every action is positive”. Not taking in account the negative actions, filibusters a learning mind of child and hence, such a child will lack an ability to justify and tackle arduous and challenging situations.
Even, a simple mathematical equation elucidates the fact that when two ‘negatives’ are added, yields a ‘positive’. Likewise, when negative actions are contemplated and worked upon, results ultimately in salubrious positiveness.
Some might argue that considering negative actions also might result to diffidence and hence, can discourage someone from learning. Yet, they discount that a role of teacher is to corroborate his students in every situation. Mulling a negative action in teaching will help a student to get a versatile knowledge and, hence bringing him out of his shell. The negative actions will facilitate his profound thinking, as a repercussion of which, a learner will gain experience and along with it more self-confidence.
In sum, I acknowledge that praising the positive actions are imperative but ignoring the second face of coin and overlooking the negative ones is not disinterested. The negative actions should be fairly considered along with the positive events. And, as Dayna Lovely said, “Even in the midst of the storm, the sun is still shining”, likewise, in spite of having negative actions, the knowledge will always keep burnishing like a sun.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'In the 1920s'.
Suggestion: In the 1920s
...y belief comes from automobile history. In 1920s, Francis W. Davis worked at an automobi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 112, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...'negatives' are added, yields a 'positive'. Likewise, when ne...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'likewise', 'look', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'while', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.221982758621 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.148706896552 0.157235817809 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0926724137931 0.0880659088768 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0387931034483 0.0497285424764 78% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0258620689655 0.0444667217837 58% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0969827586207 0.12292977631 79% => OK
Participles: 0.0495689655172 0.0406280797675 122% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.62547119992 2.79330140395 130% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0150862068966 0.030933414821 49% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0991379310345 0.0997080785238 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0301724137931 0.0249443105267 121% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0150862068966 0.0148568991511 102% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2492.0 2732.02544248 91% => OK
No of words: 376.0 452.878318584 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.62765957447 6.0361032391 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.433510638298 0.366273622748 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.335106382979 0.280924506359 119% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.252659574468 0.200843997647 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.159574468085 0.132149295362 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.62547119992 2.79330140395 130% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 219.290929204 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598404255319 0.48968727796 122% => OK
Word variations: 71.3965911307 55.4138127331 129% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.8888888889 23.380412469 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5451011448 59.4972553346 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.444444444 141.124799967 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 23.380412469 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 0.674092028746 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 54.3995271868 51.4728631049 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.72727272727 1.64882698954 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.50042263581 0.391690518653 128% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0896558292783 0.123202303941 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0645827815811 0.077325440228 84% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.56873955641 0.547984918172 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166375803651 0.149214159877 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.186696812369 0.161403998019 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917957075738 0.0892212321368 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.201928532721 0.385218514788 52% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0647903607437 0.0692045440612 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.301699876629 0.275328986314 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731741960749 0.0653680567796 112% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.4325221239 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.30420353982 245% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 7.22455752212 28% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 11.0 3.66592920354 300% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.