Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.
Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the intent of the person or people performing the action.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim AND the reason on which that claim is based.
According to the author, the claim is that if a person gets positive outcome in cost of a lots of negative actions can be accepted. To support this theory the reason is also given that when assessing the whole situations results have more priority then the type action taken. Let's agree to disagree that sometimes the main thing which counts for is the action rather then the outcome. Due to a person may know the outcome from far before time , the most intriguing part is how the thing is done. A situation has multiple actions but what method is chosen should be the main priority for a person. Which makes my stand clear that i totally disagree with the author's claim.
According to author here the result has far more importance then the result which is good for sometimes to concentrate towards the goal of yours. However sometimes greediness of reaching our goal early makes us hasty and impatient. If a person is given a task it's obvious that outcome is fixed he can do it or can't. But to judge that person the action or method he or she prefers decides the actual position. For any claim maid there are multiple reasons to follow it or to deny it.
Firstly, the main reason i disagree to the claim is that the action's moral concerning to the situation can be decided by on whom the action is taken. If there are two person judging a match of two fighters, For one winning would be counted as a good outcome and for the other one it's visa‐versa. For some people action performed is the one that matters the most but for some people the outcome is the measured as success rate. To see if a person has grown enough in past situations first it's necessary to check how he or she is getting the action done, what are the measures taken for the deed to be done.
Secondly, even let's assume for the both person the outcome is good but what cost they are paying just to get the happiness of a moment is unknown or can't be determined. Sometimes people has to pay a high price just to get the necessary output. There are lots of stories in Indian history which proves my stand reasonable. Also the world wars are the biggest example of it .In last world war result was win of America which was good outcome for them but for Japan it was a disastrous calamity they have to face. Which represents that the outcome can not be understand on the one side of coin to measure it we need both positive and negative sides of action and the outcome.
In sum, there are lots of arguments which proves the stand I made here is a reasonable one. People has to consider each and every action they take in account of the growth markings . Author's claim seems biased to one side. And the reason given seems insufficient for it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...person gets positive outcome in cost of a lots of negative actions can be accepted. To...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...e situations results have more priority then the type action taken. Lets agree to di...
^^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...re priority then the type action taken. Lets agree to disagree that sometimes the ma...
^^^^
Line 1, column 368, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...g which counts for is the action rather then the outcome. Due to a person may know t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 443, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ay know the outcome from far before time , the most intriguing part is how the thi...
^^
Line 1, column 598, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ould be the main priority for a person. Which makes my stand clear that i totally dis...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...here the result has far more importance then the result which is good for sometimes ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... concentrate towards the goal of yours. However sometimes greediness of reaching our go...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 311, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...s that outcome is fixed he can do it or cant. But to judge that person the action or...
^^^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...o deny it. Firstly, the main reason i disagree to the claim is that the actio...
^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'people', 'persons'?
Suggestion: people; persons
...m the action is taken. If there are two person judging a match of two fighters, For on...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 168, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...m the action is taken. If there are two person judging a match of two fighters, For on...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...the happiness of a moment is unknown or cant be determined. Sometimes people has to...
^^^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...unknown or cant be determined. Sometimes people has to pay a high price just to g...
^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...story which proves my stand reasonable. Also the world wars are the biggest example ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 374, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...world wars are the biggest example of it .In last world war result was win of Amer...
^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...rld wars are the biggest example of it .In last world war result was win of Americ...
^^
Line 9, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y take in account of the growth markings . Authors claim seems biased to one side....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2222.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43512974052 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29387278313 2.79657885939 82% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445109780439 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 706.5 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3987073501 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5833333333 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 18.0 7.80617977528 231% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225197427061 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700958927791 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710861656221 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139902221478 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558087214494 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 12.1639044944 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.