Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext

Essay topics:

Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

The claim mentioned above seems partially appropriate and the reason given for this, in spite of appearing more logical than the claim, can be considered partially true. An excellent leader with powers to control, is very important to make a system run, be it an autocratic, a democratic, a communist country. While power is necessary to govern a society, a necessary check on powers provided to those in leadership becomes absolutely necessary, leading to a belief that new leaders should replace the old ones.
We can see in case of successful business organizations that is is not always important for people in authority to stop down rather their consistent guidance. Like, Reliance group in India which was established by Dhiru Bhai Ambani is now being run by his descendants is still going great in term of success. Sometimes a particular type of association needs a specific kind of vision and leadership and rather change of leadership can harm instead of benefitting.
In the field of education this claim may be agreeable to some extent and disagreeable in another. If we take example of a research lab running under the guidance of an old professor, who makes his team do very conventional work and discards innovative ideas if any. Such kind of leadership even by a highly experience individual will not do any good due to the fact that his skills and knowledge are obsolete. While the reverse can also happen, a professor working on cloning does not let his research staff innovate something that actually turns against humanity like a human clone. This way by exercising control an experienced person is playing his role as a leader well. It might be possible that a novice person would have encouraged such innovations at the cost of human life.
Therefore, it can be said that it is entirely situational and subjective.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 425, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...provided to those in leadership becomes absolutely necessary, leading to a belief that new leaders s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
... successful business organizations that is is not always important for people in auth...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('highly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('experience') instead of another adjective.
...if any. Such kind of leadership even by a highly experience individual will not do any good due to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'while', 'kind of', 'in spite of']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.224550898204 0.240241500013 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.158682634731 0.157235817809 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.11377245509 0.0880659088768 129% => OK
Adverbs: 0.062874251497 0.0497285424764 126% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0359281437126 0.0444667217837 81% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134730538922 0.12292977631 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0479041916168 0.0406280797675 118% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.87921511213 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0239520958084 0.030933414821 77% => OK
Particles: 0.00299401197605 0.0016655270985 180% => OK
Determiners: 0.104790419162 0.0997080785238 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0299401197605 0.0249443105267 120% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0119760479042 0.0148568991511 81% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1837.0 2732.02544248 67% => OK
No of words: 309.0 452.878318584 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94498381877 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.58838876751 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.346278317152 0.366273622748 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.268608414239 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.220064724919 0.200843997647 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.161812297735 0.132149295362 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87921511213 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 219.290929204 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640776699029 0.48968727796 131% => OK
Word variations: 76.6865012874 55.4138127331 138% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 23.7692307692 23.380412469 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7918042915 59.4972553346 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.307692308 141.124799967 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 23.380412469 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 0.674092028746 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 50.6300721932 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.58139534884 1.64882698954 96% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262872781754 0.391690518653 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0905911040513 0.123202303941 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.048059755233 0.077325440228 62% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.523603357994 0.547984918172 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166505874177 0.149214159877 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995809348354 0.161403998019 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799408336204 0.0892212321368 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.196957547812 0.385218514788 51% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0578731697229 0.0692045440612 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14960987271 0.275328986314 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082250705826 0.0653680567796 126% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.