Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author presents a claim that, "in any field- business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years". The claim is standing on the reason that success for an enterprise can be achieved by revitalization through new leaders. However, the author's claim and reason are rife with flaws. There are numerous factors that determine the success of any enterprise, like, experience of the leader , how well he understand the system and myriad of other factors. Simply, limiting the tenure of the leaders and inviting new leaders every time is not a very prudent decision.
To begin with, consider, the field of politics. Politics, being vital for nation is something that needs its leader to be sagacious. A person who is leading our nation and working for the entire country or for even a small state, needs to have good foresight of how his decision will impact the life of people. A policy made in slapdash manner without considering its implication on mass may even prove deleterious to people. For example, if an economic minister decides to increase the taxes on every product and reduce subsidy by promulgating that the money obtained from the tax can be used for constructing roads and other things needed for the nation, then, such policy will result in increase in price of the products and will surely increase the hardships of a common person. It vividly shows that the minister if don't have experience that there are myriad of factors that needed to be considered while making a decision, then such a leader may prove to be detrimental for the country. However, and experience person in such case will consider all the factors, dependencies involved and things that will be affected by his policy and then only will take a decision. Thus, experience play a vital role in some cases where a callow or a new person may fail.
Furthermore, frequent changes may lead to instability in some cases. A leader is the one who is guiding the people of entire system on which way to walk. Thus, people working or being a part of system will have more faith in their confidence if they know that their leader is right or the leader has proved his mettle sometimes. Any new leader or a callow may not have a very intense impact, unless in very rarest cases but a leader who's part of organization for long, will surely understand its people and similarly people will also have faith on him.
Additionally, in any system it is indispensable that its leader must have profound knowledge of it. . This is vital as the leader is the one who will guide the whole system. In some cases, like a software business, a leader of the company or CEO needs to have good knowledge of the technical market and its intricacies. He needs to know that technical market is very dynamic and people changes their taste and their needs also keeps changing. Such deep understanding of any field comes only on working with that field for a long time. A young leader in such cases may not be able to grasp these things and small points quickly as these things comes, only if, one spend some good time in the field.
To sum up, young leader may be lacking experience, profundity and are more prone to ignore small points that equally important while taking any decision. To contrast, an experienced leader have a wide range of view and may observe few things that a tyro may fail to see. Hence, the claim of author to curtail the tenure of leaders in any field to five years doesn't seems to be cogent
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...terprise, like, experience of the leader , how well he understand the system and m...
^^
Line 1, column 452, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'understands'.
Suggestion: understands
... experience of the leader , how well he understand the system and myriad of other factors....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 822, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
.... It vividly shows that the minister if dont have experience that there are myriad o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...nless in very rarest cases but a leader whos part of organization for long, will sur...
^^^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...der must have profound knowledge of it. . This is vital as the leader is the one ...
^
Line 7, column 637, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'things'' or 'thing's'?
Suggestion: things'; thing's
...hings and small points quickly as these things comes, only if, one spend some good tim...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 359, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e of leaders in any field to five years doesnt seems to be cogent
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to five years doesnt seems to be cogent
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'in some cases', 'to begin with', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245588235294 0.240241500013 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.151470588235 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0779411764706 0.0880659088768 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0470588235294 0.0497285424764 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0294117647059 0.0444667217837 66% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116176470588 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0426470588235 0.0406280797675 105% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.5636485562 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0279411764706 0.030933414821 90% => OK
Particles: 0.00294117647059 0.0016655270985 177% => OK
Determiners: 0.110294117647 0.0997080785238 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0338235294118 0.0249443105267 136% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0191176470588 0.0148568991511 129% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3530.0 2732.02544248 129% => OK
No of words: 617.0 452.878318584 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72123176661 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98392262146 4.58838876751 109% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.327390599676 0.366273622748 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.199351701783 0.280924506359 71% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.137763371151 0.200843997647 69% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0891410048622 0.132149295362 67% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5636485562 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 276.0 219.290929204 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447325769854 0.48968727796 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 54.4613760495 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6194690265 131% => OK
Sentence length: 22.8518518519 23.380412469 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1719738736 59.4972553346 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.740740741 141.124799967 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8518518519 23.380412469 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.62962962963 0.674092028746 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 42.7870220301 51.4728631049 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.77419354839 1.64882698954 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330937897115 0.391690518653 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132347434475 0.123202303941 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.074987681401 0.077325440228 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.470063880678 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.170502640031 0.149214159877 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124445245989 0.161403998019 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957254464903 0.0892212321368 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.40980947248 0.385218514788 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0476759182734 0.0692045440612 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233629448343 0.275328986314 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945550430087 0.0653680567796 145% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88274336283 225% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 10.0 2.70907079646 369% => OK
Total topic words: 26.0 13.5995575221 191% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.