Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline.
Write a response in which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The claim here presented "Impact of blogosphere and social media weakened the quality of political issues in united states" with the reason that "anyone one publising there opinion regarding political affairs can be not be neutral and standard it would have his/her personal opinion reflecting and can weaken or make sorong a opinion." is a intresting topic. The author has presented a supporting reason which is enough to strengthen this claim. As described that the not only in United States, it is prevalent in many country across globe. I would support the author's claim on declining quaility of political discourse.
As discused above any decisive step taken by political parties have positive and negative parts. Due to this if the citizens of the country would be more exposed to its negative parts due to blogs and social media and less afflicted to its positive parts due to which they won't be able to get find the good part of it.Rather if some has more affection with one party then it can use blogs on internet and social media to undermine the decision taken by the other party. It can also be that the members of other party can raise trivial objection to slow the decisive process of other party and it can also spread wrong information among the citizen. As for example the current elections in united states have two fascinating candidate Donald trump and Hilary clinton, major social media knows about their negative parts rather that the good work done by them. The comparison between them should be based on the their working power and stategies regarding political issues and not on their negative parts.
It can also be the case that the political members can use the social media and blogosphere to uplift there party and can influence the citizens to collect the votes of people.On the same side people can misrepresent the information given by the political outcomes.
Finally concluding my topic I would agree with the claim made my author. This aspect would become increasingly important during the time of political decisions and its outcoming results. The use of social media has negative impact on political discourse but if remained germane to the issues and not influenced by personal opinion would have a great and better impact on political world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...tral and standard it would have his/her personal opinion reflecting and can weaken or make soron...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...eflecting and can weaken or make sorong a opinion.' is a intresting topic. T...
^
Line 1, column 360, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...aken or make sorong a opinion.' is a intresting topic. The author has presen...
^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Rather
...be able to get find the good part of it.Rather if some has more affection with one par...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...be able to get find the good part of it.Rather if some has more affection with one par...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 742, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'trump' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'trumps'.
Suggestion: trumps
...s have two fascinating candidate Donald trump and Hilary clinton, major social media ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 907, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...parison between them should be based on the their working power and stategies regarding p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: On
...citizens to collect the votes of people.On the same side people can misrepresent t...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ion given by the political outcomes. Finally concluding my topic I would agree with ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 315, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ane to the issues and not influenced by personal opinion would have a great and better impact on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'if', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'as for', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238442822384 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.136253041363 0.157235817809 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.14598540146 0.0880659088768 166% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0413625304136 0.0497285424764 83% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0462287104623 0.0444667217837 104% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109489051095 0.12292977631 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0389294403893 0.0406280797675 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.6015494661 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.029197080292 0.030933414821 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0948905109489 0.0997080785238 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0413625304136 0.0249443105267 166% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00729927007299 0.0148568991511 49% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2311.0 2732.02544248 85% => OK
No of words: 384.0 452.878318584 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01822916667 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.3671875 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263020833333 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.1953125 0.200843997647 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.135416666667 0.132149295362 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6015494661 2.79330140395 93% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 219.290929204 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489583333333 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 52.4992400938 55.4138127331 95% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 29.5384615385 23.380412469 126% => OK
Sentence length SD: 102.078285308 59.4972553346 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.769230769 141.124799967 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5384615385 23.380412469 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.692307692308 0.674092028746 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.21349557522 192% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 55.8405448718 51.4728631049 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.72826086957 1.64882698954 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.472169492907 0.391690518653 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.107320388317 0.123202303941 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0768785677836 0.077325440228 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.564508045449 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.207393213831 0.149214159877 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214338310582 0.161403998019 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102608719418 0.0892212321368 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.433545400002 0.385218514788 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0965236985037 0.0692045440612 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.368647214512 0.275328986314 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790823141758 0.0653680567796 121% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88274336283 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.