Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline.
Write a response in which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
With technology governing the way people work and the way we lead our lives, it is impossible to stick to old methods and practices such as Telegraph, Newpapers. The emergence of the online 'blogosphere' is the advent of information technology in which there is constant evolvement. And as each individual has the freedom of speech he can speak out about it, and showcast his talents by using blogs.
With various social platforms such as Facebook, Twitter people can easily there feelings about anything, but this sometimes may adversely affect the society. As terrorists use such platforms for gaining information about anything they may provide insubstantial information about any politician and that may lead to unneutrality among people. However, blogosphere can be hepful in such a way that it may bring many things to the view of people. Since many politicians own many news companies so they keep on showcasting the good things done by the politicians and bolstering him during elections. But by using blogosphere a blog writer can express the politicians works and deeds to the people and this may inevitably decline the standards for covering news and political topics. As the saying goes Democracy is something that is 'by the people','for the people' and 'of the people'. So in democratic country like United States the blogosphere should be used to outcast the wrong doings of the politicians, but should be used in limits and used for proper things.
As many people also use blogs for enhancing the rifts between two politicians and this may exploit once reputation which can lead to fights.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...w of people. Since many politicians own many news companies so they keep on showcast...
^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun news seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much news', 'a good deal of news'.
Suggestion: much news; a good deal of news
...w of people. Since many politicians own many news companies so they keep on showcasting t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 686, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the politicians works and deeds to the people and this may inevitably decline t...
^^
Line 3, column 845, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , for
...cracy is something that is by the people,for the people and of the people. So in dem...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253521126761 0.240241500013 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.147887323944 0.157235817809 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0739436619718 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0316901408451 0.0497285424764 64% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0352112676056 0.0444667217837 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137323943662 0.12292977631 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0457746478873 0.0406280797675 113% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.81732636088 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0246478873239 0.030933414821 80% => OK
Particles: 0.00352112676056 0.0016655270985 211% => OK
Determiners: 0.102112676056 0.0997080785238 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0457746478873 0.0249443105267 184% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0105633802817 0.0148568991511 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1603.0 2732.02544248 59% => OK
No of words: 264.0 452.878318584 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.07196969697 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.58838876751 88% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367424242424 0.366273622748 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.268939393939 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19696969697 0.200843997647 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.170454545455 0.132149295362 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81732636088 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 219.290929204 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.48968727796 111% => OK
Word variations: 54.0341626314 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6194690265 53% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.380412469 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6114006743 59.4972553346 51% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.727272727 141.124799967 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.380412469 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.674092028746 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 50.8939393939 51.4728631049 99% => OK
Elegance: 2.03278688525 1.64882698954 123% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386565256625 0.391690518653 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.148579079908 0.123202303941 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0574884738519 0.077325440228 74% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.580654343674 0.547984918172 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.15944182226 0.149214159877 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184213763446 0.161403998019 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103343856012 0.0892212321368 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.419378475671 0.385218514788 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0681443529092 0.0692045440612 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255075636586 0.275328986314 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108416470722 0.0653680567796 166% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.4325221239 29% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.