Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline
The presence of unofficial online news from social media or "blogosphere" has neither jeopardized the standard of covering news nor negatively affecting politics.
First, the government use official news site and channels to reach citizens, this is because the government is aware that people will definitely get the news through these channels. For instance, during campaign and election process information you can find that people rely for official information from channels like CNN, BBC. It is clearly that, presence of social media does not affect people rely on well known official news sources. The society still relies on standard new channels to hear serious information.
Second, social media act a secondary source of information where the standard media can review and get some leads/ clue for some of the information which they miss. Later, they can work further to know the truth of things they have not covered. Therefore, they support standard sources and not the vice versa.
Some argue that when anybody can publish his/her opinion will decline the standards for news. This is flawed. In fact, social media offer society with an alternative explanation because some media could be in favor of only one side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...can review and get some leads/ clue for some of the information which they miss. Later, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'for instance', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.273542600897 0.240241500013 114% => OK
Verbs: 0.143497757848 0.157235817809 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0762331838565 0.0880659088768 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0582959641256 0.0497285424764 117% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0269058295964 0.0444667217837 61% => OK
Prepositions: 0.116591928251 0.12292977631 95% => OK
Participles: 0.0269058295964 0.0406280797675 66% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.77248455679 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0134529147982 0.030933414821 43% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0986547085202 0.0997080785238 99% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0313901345291 0.0249443105267 126% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0134529147982 0.0148568991511 91% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1244.0 2732.02544248 46% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 197.0 452.878318584 43% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.31472081218 6.0361032391 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.58838876751 82% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38578680203 0.366273622748 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294416243655 0.280924506359 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197969543147 0.200843997647 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.111675126904 0.132149295362 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77248455679 2.79330140395 99% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 219.290929204 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619289340102 0.48968727796 126% => OK
Word variations: 60.8530707044 55.4138127331 110% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 20.6194690265 53% => OK
Sentence length: 17.9090909091 23.380412469 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2567904452 59.4972553346 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.090909091 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 23.380412469 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.727272727273 0.674092028746 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 47.3507152746 51.4728631049 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.82352941176 1.64882698954 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33028088591 0.391690518653 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.10364112607 0.123202303941 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0704805053075 0.077325440228 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.564653810569 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.199371375564 0.149214159877 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131238501051 0.161403998019 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954341027822 0.0892212321368 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.196509626066 0.385218514788 51% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0259995336857 0.0692045440612 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227533892055 0.275328986314 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691955626438 0.0653680567796 106% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.4325221239 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.30420353982 57% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 13.5995575221 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.