Claim: The emergence of the online "blogosphere" has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States.
Reason: When anyone can publish political opinions easily, standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decline
The presence of unofficial online news from social media or “blogosphere” has neither jeopardized the standard of covering news nor negatively affecting politics.
First, the government use official news site and channels to reach citizens, this is because the government is aware that people will definitely get the news through these channels. For instance, during campaign and election process information you can find that people rely for official information from channels like CNN, BBC. It is clearly that, presence of social media does not affect people rely on well known official news sources. The society still relies on standard new channels to hear serious information.
Second, social media act a secondary source of information where the standard media can review and get some leads/ clue for some of the information which they miss. Later, they can work further to know the truth of things they have not covered. Therefore, they support standard sources and not the vice versa.
Third, social media act a secondary source of information where the standard media can review and get some leads/ clue for some of the information which they miss. Later, they can work further to know the truth of things they have not covered. Therefore, they support standard sources and not the vice versa.
Some argue that when anybody can publish his/her opinion will decline the standards for news. This is flawed. In fact, social media offer society with an alternative explanation because some media could be in favor of only one side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...can review and get some leads/ clue for some of the information which they miss. Later, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...can review and get some leads/ clue for some of the information which they miss. Later, the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'second', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'third', 'well', 'for instance', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.262411347518 0.240241500013 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.145390070922 0.157235817809 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0744680851064 0.0880659088768 85% => OK
Adverbs: 0.063829787234 0.0497285424764 128% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0354609929078 0.0444667217837 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.106382978723 0.12292977631 87% => OK
Participles: 0.0248226950355 0.0406280797675 61% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.68000298507 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0141843971631 0.030933414821 46% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.102836879433 0.0997080785238 103% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.031914893617 0.0249443105267 128% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0177304964539 0.0148568991511 119% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1556.0 2732.02544248 57% => OK
No of words: 250.0 452.878318584 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.224 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.58838876751 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376 0.366273622748 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.272 0.280924506359 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184 0.200843997647 92% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.104 0.132149295362 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68000298507 2.79330140395 96% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 219.290929204 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 45.6877089081 55.4138127331 82% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6194690265 68% => OK
Sentence length: 17.8571428571 23.380412469 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2472902908 59.4972553346 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 141.124799967 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 23.380412469 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.642857142857 0.674092028746 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 45.0571428571 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.60869565217 1.64882698954 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323821821003 0.391690518653 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.114087251342 0.123202303941 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0644541562048 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.575738813395 0.547984918172 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.184450728352 0.149214159877 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13446161913 0.161403998019 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862535065626 0.0892212321368 97% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.392289862231 0.385218514788 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.339848031379 0.0692045440612 491% => No any connections among paragraphs
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226066820583 0.275328986314 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619599056365 0.0653680567796 95% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.4325221239 77% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.